SynthesisWorld journal of gastroenterology2016
Use of the Endocuff during routine colonoscopy examination improves adenoma detection: A meta-analysis.
Synthesis in World journal of gastroenterology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Use of Endocuff Vision to Increase Detection of Sessile Serrated Adenomas During Screening Colonoscopy
Adenoma Detection Rate With ARC Endocuff Vision Assisted Colonoscopy vs. Standard Colonoscopy in Colorectal Cancer Screening: a Multicenter Randomized Italian Study
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effectiveness of artificial intelligence-assisted colonoscopy in detecting and diagnosing colorectal tumors: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.International journal of colorectal disease · 2025Pooled it
- Effect of Endocuff use on colonoscopy outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.World journal of gastroenterology · 2019Pooled it
- Trial
- Study on detection rate of polyps and adenomas in artificial-intelligence-aided colonoscopy.Saudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology AssociationTrial
- Integration of Endocuff-Assisted and Computer-Aided Colonoscopy: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2026Review
- Assessment of colorectal polyp detection along the short-axis direction of the intestinal lumen during colonoscopic observation: a retrospective study in Japan.Clinical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Endocuff-Assisted Colonoscopy for Identifying Sessile Serrated Polyps and Adenomas During Routine Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Retrospective Cohort Study.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2025Article
- Colonic distension with balloon colonoscopy versus standard and distal attachment colonoscopy.iGIE : innovation, investigation and insights · 2023Article
- The Role of an Artificial Intelligence Method of Improving the Diagnosis of Neoplasms by Colonoscopy.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Clinical evaluation of a real-time artificial intelligence-based polyp detection system: a US multi-center pilot study.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Measuring and Improving Quality of Colonoscopy for Colorectal Cancer Screening.Techniques and innovations in gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2022Article
- Endocuff Vision improves adenoma detection rate in a large screening-related cohort.Endoscopy international open · 2021Article
- Efficacy of Endocuff Vision compared to first-generation Endocuff in adenoma detection rate and polyp detection rate in high-definition colonoscopy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Endoscopy international open · 2021Review
- Endocuff-Assisted versus Cap-Assisted Colonoscopy Performed by Trainees: A Retrospective Study.Clinical endoscopy · 2020Article
- Comparison of colon adenoma detection rates using cap-assisted and Endocuff-assisted colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial.Endoscopy international open · 2019Article
- Does Increased Adenoma Detection Reduce the Risk of Colorectal Cancer, and How Good Do We Need to Be?Current gastroenterology reports · 2019Review
- Cost-effectiveness of adding EndocuffClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR · 2019Article
- Colonoscopy attachments for the detection of precancerous lesions during colonoscopy: A review of the literature.World journal of gastroenterology · 2018Review
- Faster colonoscope withdrawal time without impaired detection using EndoRings.Endoscopy international open · 2018Article
- Efficacy of Endocuff-assisted colonoscopy in the detection of colorectal polyps.Endoscopy international open · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo perform meta-analysis of the use of Endocuff during average risk screening colonoscopy.
methodsScopus, Cochrane databases, MEDLINE/PubMed, and CINAHL were searched in April 2016. Abstracts from Digestive Disease Week, United European Gastroenterology, and the American College of Gastroenterology meeting were also searched from 2004-2015. Studies comparing EC-assisted colonoscopy (EAC) to standard colonoscopy, for any indication, were included in the analysis. The analysis was conducted by using the Mantel-Haenszel or DerSimonian and Laird models with the odds ratio (OR) to assess adenoma detection, cecal intubation rate, and complications performed.
resultsNine studies (
conclusionThe use of an EC on colonoscopy appears to improve pre-cancerous polyp detection without any difference in cecal intubation rates compared to standard colonoscopy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.