Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27920382›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2017

Adaptation to fragmentation: evolutionary dynamics driven by human influences.

Pierre-Olivier Cheptou, Anna L Hargreaves, Dries Bonte, Hans Jacquemyn

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 52 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed
50.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 202 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Colonization of vineyards by non-bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Integrating biogeography and behavioral ecology to rapidly address biodiversity loss.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Pierre-Olivier CheptouCEFE UMR 5175, CNRS, Université de Montpellier, Université Paul-Valery, EPHE - 1919, route de Mende, 34293 Montpellier cedex 05, France pierre-olivier.cheptou@cefe.cnrs.fr.ORCID 0000-0002-5739-5176
Anna L HargreavesBiodiversity Research Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6T 1Z4.
Dries BonteDepartment of Biology, Ghent University, K.L. Ledeganckstraat 35, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
Hans JacquemynKU Leuven, Biology Department, Plant Conservation and Population Biology, Kasteelpark Arenberg 31, 3001 Heverlee, Belgium.
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRGhent University · BEKU Leuven · BEUniversity of British Columbia · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fragmentation-the process by which habitats are transformed into smaller patches isolated from each other-has been identified as a major threat for biodiversity. Fragmentation has well-established demographic and population genetic consequences, eroding genetic diversity and hindering gene flow among patches. However, fragmentation should also select on life history, both predictably through increased isolation, demographic stochasticity and edge effects, and more idiosyncratically via altered biotic interactions. While species have adapted to natural fragmentation, adaptation to anthropogenic fragmentation has received little attention. In this review, we address how and whether organisms might adapt to anthropogenic fragmentation. Drawing on selected case studies and evolutionary ecology models, we show that anthropogenic fragmentation can generate selection on traits at both the patch and landscape scale, and affect the adaptive potential of populations. We suggest that dispersal traits are likely to experience especially strong selection, as dispersal both enables migration among patches and increases the risk of landing in the inhospitable matrix surrounding them. We highlight that suites of associated traits are likely to evolve together. Importantly, we show that adaptation will not necessarily rescue populations from the negative effects of fragmentation, and may even exacerbate them, endangering the entire metapopulation.This article is part of the themed issue 'Human influences on evolution, and the ecological and societal consequences'.

Indexed as

Adaptation, BiologicalEcosystemSelection, GeneticAnimalsHuman ActivitiesHumansPlantsanthropogenic fragmentationdispersalevolutionary rescueisland biogeographymetapopulationshort-term adaptation

Identifiers

PMID27920382
PMCPMC5182433
OpenAlexW2559776659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.