ReviewWestern journal of nursing research2017
Symptom Cluster Research With Biomarkers and Genetics Using Latent Class Analysis.
Review in Western journal of nursing research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Clinical and Structural Findings in Patients With Lesion-Induced Dystonia: Descriptive and Quantitative Analysis of Published Cases.Neurology · 2022Pooled it
- Symptom Experiences in Colorectal Cancer Survivors After Cancer Treatments: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Cancer nursingPooled it
- Oral frailty subtypes and influencing factors in older patients with ischemic stroke: a latent profile analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Analysis of the potential profile and influencing factors for oral frailty in olderly patients with dental implants.BMC oral health · 2024Article
- Applying Latent Variable Models to Estimate Cumulative Exposure Burden to Chemical Mixtures and Identify Latent Exposure Subgroups: A Critical Review and Future Directions.Statistics in biosciences · 2024Article
- Risk factors for self-reported high symptom cluster burdens in patients with breast cancer undergoing chemotherapy in China: A cross-sectional study.Health science reports · 2024Article
- Article
- Sexual behaviours and sexual health among middle-aged and older adults in Britain.Sexually transmitted infections · 2023Article
- Cardiovascular damage phenotypes and all-cause and CVD mortality in older adults.Annals of epidemiology · 2021Article
- Symptom cluster profiles following traumatic orthopedic injuries: A protocol.Research in nursing & health · 2021Article
- Latent variable mixture modelling and individual treatment prediction.Behaviour research and therapy · 2020Article
- Symptom clusters in adults with inflammatory bowel disease.Research in nursing & health · 2017Article
- Article
- Physical Symptom Cluster Subgroups in Chronic Kidney Disease.Nursing researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
The purpose of this article is to provide an overview of latent class analysis (LCA) and examples from symptom cluster research that includes biomarkers and genetics. A review of LCA with genetics and biomarkers was conducted using Medline, Embase, PubMed, and Google Scholar. LCA is a robust latent variable model used to cluster categorical data and allows for the determination of empirically determined symptom clusters. Researchers should consider using LCA to link empirically determined symptom clusters to biomarkers and genetics to better understand the underlying etiology of symptom clusters. The full potential of LCA in symptom cluster research has not yet been realized because it has been used in limited populations, and researchers have explored limited biologic pathways.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.