ReviewThe Journal of cell biology2017
Navigating challenges in the application of superresolution microscopy.
Review in The Journal of cell biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
60 citing papers in PubMed, 97 citations in OpenAlex.
- Genetically encoded dinitrobenzyl photostabilizer for enhancing the photostability of fluorescent proteins.RSC chemical biology · 2026Article
- SIMworks-an integrated software suite for quality-controlled augmented quantitative structured illumination microscopy.Nature protocols · 2026Review
- From EM to AI: Multiscale imaging of the secretory pathway with insights from plant cells.Journal of microscopy · 2026Review
- Machine Learning in Single-Molecule Tracking Analysis of Superresolution Optical Microscopy Data.Cells · 2026Review
- Single-Molecule Localization Microscopy of Membrane Proteins using Single-Antibody Labeling.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2026Article
- A comparison of super-resolution microscopy techniques for imaging tightly packed microcolonies of an obligate intracellular bacterium.Journal of microscopy · 2026Article
- Transition metal complexes as optical probes for super-resolution microscopy.Nature reviews. Chemistry · 2025Review
- Deep learning in chromatin organization: from super-resolution microscopy to clinical applications.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2025Review
- Bright and photostable yellow fluorescent proteins for extended imaging.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Integrating bioengineering, super-resolution microscopy and mechanobiology in autophagy research: addendum to the guidelines (4th edition).Autophagy · 2025Article
- Navigating the intricate in-vivo journey of lipid nanoparticles tailored for the targeted delivery of RNA therapeutics: a quality-by-design approach.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2024Review
- Tracking endogenous proteins based on RNA editing-mediated genetic code expansion.Nature chemical biology · 2024Article
- Super-resolution techniques for biomedical applications and challenges.Biomedical engineering letters · 2024Review
- iU-ExM: nanoscopy of organelles and tissues with iterative ultrastructure expansion microscopy.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Towards effective adoption of novel image analysis methods.Nature methods · 2023Article
- Super-resolution STED imaging in the inner and outer whole-mount mouse retina.Frontiers in ophthalmology · 2023Article
- Quantitative Profiling of Alpha-Subunit of IL-3 Receptor on Single Acute Myeloid Leukemia Cells by Super-Resolution Imaging.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2023Article
- Analyzing the cellular plasma membrane by fast and efficient correlative STED and platinum replica EM.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023Article
- Advanced image-free analysis of the nano-organization of chromatin and other biomolecules by Single Molecule Localization Microscopy (SMLM).Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023Article
- Bringing synapses into focus: Recent advances in synaptic imaging and mass-spectrometry for studying synaptopathy.Frontiers in synaptic neuroscience · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In 2014, the Nobel Prize in Chemistry was awarded to three scientists who have made groundbreaking contributions to the field of superresolution (SR) microscopy (SRM). The first commercial SR microscope came to market a decade earlier, and many other commercial options have followed. As commercialization has lowered the barrier to using SRM and the awarding of the Nobel Prize has drawn attention to these methods, biologists have begun adopting SRM to address a wide range of questions in many types of specimens. There is no shortage of reviews on the fundamental principles of SRM and the remarkable achievements made with these methods. We approach SRM from another direction: we focus on the current practical limitations and compromises that must be made when designing an SRM experiment. We provide information and resources to help biologists navigate through common pitfalls in SRM specimen preparation and optimization of image acquisition as well as errors and artifacts that may compromise the reproducibility of SRM data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.