ArticleJournal of medical ethics2017
Improving on effective antiretroviral therapy: how good will a cure have to be?
Article in Journal of medical ethics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Randomized Phase 1 Study Evaluating Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Tolerability of a High-Concentration, Long-Acting Cabotegravir Formulation in Adults Without HIV.Clinical pharmacology in drug development · 2025Trial
- Considerations for designing and implementing combination HIV cure trials: findings from a qualitative in-depth interview study in the United States.AIDS research and therapy · 2021Article
- Ethics of HIV cure research: an unfinished agenda.BMC medical ethics · 2021Review
- "We Need to Deploy Them Very Thoughtfully and Carefully": Perceptions of Analytical Treatment Interruptions in HIV Cure Research in the United States-A Qualitative Inquiry.AIDS research and human retroviruses · 2018Article
- Despite Gains, the War on HIV Is Far From Over: With No Cure in Sight, Experts Urge Early Diagnosis and Prompt Treatment With Better Adherence.P & T : a peer-reviewed journal for formulary management · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.