Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27920138›Full record

ArticleCancer discovery2016

Culprit or Bystander? The Role of the Fallopian Tube in "Ovarian" High-Grade Serous Carcinoma.

Elizabeth M Swisher, Rochelle L Garcia, Mark R Kilgore, Barbara M Norquist

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComment
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer discovery, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Elizabeth M SwisherDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington. swishere@uw.edu.
Rochelle L GarciaDepartment of Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Mark R KilgoreDepartment of Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Barbara M NorquistDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
University of Washington · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The concurrence of intraepithelial high-grade neoplasia in the fallopian tube with metastatic implants has been taken as evidence of a tubal origin for high-grade serous pelvic carcinomas. In the current issue, Eckert and colleagues perform detailed genomic phylogenetic analyses and demonstrate that some cases of high-grade serous intraepithelial tubal neoplasia are metastatic implants and not precursor lesions. Cancer Discov; 6(12); 1309-11. ©2016 AACR.See related article by Eckert and colleagues, p. 1342.

Indexed as

Fallopian Tube NeoplasmsFallopian TubesAnimalsCarcinoma in SituCystadenocarcinoma, SerousFemaleHumansOvarian NeoplasmsPhylogeny

Identifiers

PMID27920138
OpenAlexW2560143655

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.