Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27920086›Full record

ArticleGenes & development2016

A role for mitotic bookmarking of SOX2 in pluripotency and differentiation.

Cédric Deluz, Elias T Friman, Daniel Strebinger, Alexander Benke, Mahé Raccaud, Andrea Callegari, Marion Leleu, Suliana Manley, David M Suter

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genes & development, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 89 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
89citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

89 citing papers in PubMed, 170 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Enhanced Activities of OCT4 and SOX2 Promote Epigenetic Reprogramming by Shortening G1 Phase.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

29 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Cédric DeluzUPSUTER, The Institute of Bioengineering (IBI), School of Life Sciences, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Elias T FrimanUPSUTER, The Institute of Bioengineering (IBI), School of Life Sciences, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Daniel StrebingerUPSUTER, The Institute of Bioengineering (IBI), School of Life Sciences, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Alexander BenkeUPSUTER, The Institute of Bioengineering (IBI), School of Life Sciences, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Mahé RaccaudUPSUTER, The Institute of Bioengineering (IBI), School of Life Sciences, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Andrea CallegariInstitute of Physics, Laboratory of Experimental Biophysics, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Marion LeleuBioinformatics and Biostatistics Core Facility, School of Life Sciences, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Suliana ManleyInstitute of Physics, Laboratory of Experimental Biophysics, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.
David M SuterUPSUTER, The Institute of Bioengineering (IBI), School of Life Sciences, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.
École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mitotic bookmarking transcription factors remain bound to chromosomes during mitosis and were proposed to regulate phenotypic maintenance of stem and progenitor cells at the mitosis-to-G1 (M-G1) transition. However, mitotic bookmarking remains largely unexplored in most stem cell types, and its functional relevance for cell fate decisions remains unclear. Here we screened for mitotic chromosome binding within the pluripotency network of embryonic stem (ES) cells and show that SOX2 and OCT4 remain bound to mitotic chromatin through their respective DNA-binding domains. Dynamic characterization using photobleaching-based methods and single-molecule imaging revealed quantitatively similar specific DNA interactions, but different nonspecific DNA interactions, of SOX2 and OCT4 with mitotic chromatin. Using ChIP-seq (chromatin immunoprecipitation [ChIP] combined with high-throughput sequencing) to assess the genome-wide distribution of SOX2 on mitotic chromatin, we demonstrate the bookmarking activity of SOX2 on a small set of genes. Finally, we investigated the function of SOX2 mitotic bookmarking in cell fate decisions and show that its absence at the M-G1 transition impairs pluripotency maintenance and abrogates its ability to induce neuroectodermal differentiation but does not affect reprogramming efficiency toward induced pluripotent stem cells. Our study demonstrates the mitotic bookmarking property of SOX2 and reveals its functional importance in pluripotency maintenance and ES cell differentiation.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell DifferentiationCellular ReprogrammingChromatinEmbryonic Stem CellsG1 PhaseHEK293 CellsHumansInduced Pluripotent Stem CellsMiceMitosisNeural PlateNIH 3T3 CellsOctamer Transcription Factor-3Protein BindingSOXB1 Transcription FactorsChromatinOctamer Transcription Factor-3SOXB1 Transcription Factorsembryonic stem cellsmitotic bookmarkingneuroectodermpluripotency

Identifiers

PMID27920086
PMCPMC5159668
OpenAlexW2560055008

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.