Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27919287›Full record

ArticleBMC complementary and alternative medicine2016

Chemical profiling, antimicrobial and insecticidal evaluations of Polygonum hydropiper L.

Muhammad Ayaz, Muhammad Junaid, Farhat Ullah, Abdul Sadiq, Muhammad Ovais, Waqar Ahmad, Sajjad Ahmad, Anwar Zeb

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC complementary and alternative medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Natural Compounds as Antimicrobial Agents-2nd Edition.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Antibacterial activity ofFrontiers in plant science · 2025
    Article
  5. The genusHeliyon · 2024
    Review
  6. Fertility regulatory potential ofSaudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Phytochemical Analysis,Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Heliyon · 2019
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Muhammad AyazDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Malakand, Khyber Pakhtoonkhwa (KPK), 18000, Pakistan. ayazuop@gmail.com.
Muhammad JunaidDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Malakand, Khyber Pakhtoonkhwa (KPK), 18000, Pakistan.
Farhat UllahDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Malakand, Khyber Pakhtoonkhwa (KPK), 18000, Pakistan.
Abdul SadiqDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Malakand, Khyber Pakhtoonkhwa (KPK), 18000, Pakistan.
Muhammad OvaisCancer Biology Lab (MOSEL), Department of Biotechnology, Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Waqar AhmadDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Malakand, Khyber Pakhtoonkhwa (KPK), 18000, Pakistan.
Sajjad AhmadDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Malakand, Khyber Pakhtoonkhwa (KPK), 18000, Pakistan.
Anwar ZebDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Malakand, Khyber Pakhtoonkhwa (KPK), 18000, Pakistan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe emergence of multidrug resistant (MDR) pathogens is of great concern to the global health community. Our ability to effectively treat diseases is based on the discovery of potent drugs for the treatment of these challenging diseases. Traditional medicines are one of the major sources for the discovery of safe, effective and economical drug candidates. In order to validate its antibacterial, antifungal and insecticidal potentials with respect to traditional uses, we have screened for the first time Polygonum hydropiper against pathogenic bacterial, fungal strains and a variety of insects.

methodsPolygonum hydropiper samples including crude extract (Ph.Cr), subsequent fractions; n-hexane (Ph.Hex), chloroform (Ph.Chf), ethyl acetate (Ph.EtAc), n-Butanol (Ph.Bt), aqueous (Ph.Aq) and crude saponins (Ph.Sp) were tested against pathogenic bacterial and fungal strains. Insecticidal activities were performed against Tribolium castaneum and Rhyzopertha dominica and Monomorium pharaonis. Ph.Cr was analyzed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) for preliminary identification of chemical constituents.

resultsIn disc diffusion assay, Ph.Chf, Ph.Hex, Ph.EtAc and Ph.Sp exhibited highest activity against Enterococcus faecalis. MICs of Ph.Chf against Enterococcus faecalis, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Escherichia coli, P. mirabilis, Staphylococcus aureus, Salmonella typhi and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were 32.00, 13.33, 10.66, 5.33, 64.00, 8.66 and 10.66 μg/ml respectively. MFC's of Ph.Chf against Aspergillus fumigatus, Aspergillus flavus, Aspergillus niger and Fusarium oxysporum were 16.66, 23.33, 125.00 and 46.66 μg/ml respectively. Ph.EtAc, Ph.Sp, Ph.Chf and Ph.Bt were most active fractions against T. castaneum and R. dominica. Ph.Sp being most active against A. punctatum exhibited LC

conclusionsP. hydropiper samples exhibited broad spectrum of activity against bacterial and fungal strains. Our results support previously reported insecticidal properties of saponins and may provide scientific justification for the ethno-medicinal uses of the plant.

Indexed as

InsecticidesAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntifungal AgentsColeopteraDisk Diffusion Antimicrobial TestsMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPlant ExtractsPolygonumAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntifungal AgentsInsecticidesPlant ExtractsAnobium punctatumFungicidal and antibacterial activityGas chromatographyLarvicidalMonomorium pharaonisRhyzopertha dominicaTribolium castaneum

Identifiers

PMID27919287
PMCPMC5139080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.