Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27919283›Full record

ReviewCritical care (London, England)2016

Outcomes and survival prediction models for severe adult acute respiratory distress syndrome treated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

Sacha Rozencwajg, David Pilcher, Alain Combes, Matthieu Schmidt

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Critical care (London, England), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Quality of life following adult veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for acute respiratory distress syndrome: a systematic review.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. VV-ECMO in critical COVID-19 obese patients: a cohort study.Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Veno-Venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in COVID-19-Where Are We Now?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. [ECMO treatment in acute lung failure : Who profits?]Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2020
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sacha RozencwajgSorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, INSERM, UMRS_1166-ICAN, Institute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition, 75651, Paris Cedex 13, France.
David PilcherAustralian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Alain CombesSorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, INSERM, UMRS_1166-ICAN, Institute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition, 75651, Paris Cedex 13, France.
Matthieu SchmidtSorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, INSERM, UMRS_1166-ICAN, Institute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition, 75651, Paris Cedex 13, France. matthieu.schmidt@aphp.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) for severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) has known a growing interest over the last decades with promising results during the 2009 A(H1N1) influenza epidemic. Targeting populations that can most benefit from this therapy is now of major importance.Survival has steadily improved for a decade, reaching up to 65% at hospital discharge in the most recent cohorts. However, ECMO is still marred by frequent and significant complications such as bleeding and nosocomial infections. In addition, physiological and psychological symptoms are commonly described in long-term follow-up of ECMO-treated ARDS survivors. Because this therapy is costly and exposes patients to significant complications, seven prediction models have been developed recently to help clinicians identify patients most likely to survive once ECMO has been initiated and to facilitate appropriate comparison of risk-adjusted outcomes between centres and over time. Higher age, immunocompromised status, associated extra-pulmonary organ dysfunction, low respiratory compliance and non-influenzae diagnosis seem to be the main determinants of poorer outcome.

Indexed as

Models, TheoreticalSeverity of Illness IndexExtracorporeal Membrane OxygenationHumansPredictive Value of TestsRespiratory Distress SyndromeSurvival RateTreatment OutcomeAcute respiratory distress syndromeECMO-related complicationsExtracorporeal membrane oxygenationOutcomePredictive survival models

Identifiers

PMID27919283
PMCPMC5139100

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.