Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27919228›Full record

ArticleBMC microbiology2016

Antimicrobial activity and safety evaluation of peptides isolated from the hemoglobin of chickens.

Fengjiao Hu, Qiaoxing Wu, Shuang Song, Ruiping She, Yue Zhao, Yifei Yang, Meikun Zhang, Fang Du, Majid Hussain Soomro, Ruihan Shi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC microbiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Sarconesin II, a New Antimicrobial Peptide Isolated fromMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Fengjiao HuDepartment of Veterinary Pathology and Public Health, Key Laboratory of Zoonosis of Ministry of Agriculture College of Veterinary Medicine, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China.
Qiaoxing WuDepartment of Veterinary Pathology and Public Health, Key Laboratory of Zoonosis of Ministry of Agriculture College of Veterinary Medicine, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China.
Shuang SongDepartment of Veterinary Pathology and Public Health, Key Laboratory of Zoonosis of Ministry of Agriculture College of Veterinary Medicine, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China.
Ruiping SheDepartment of Veterinary Pathology and Public Health, Key Laboratory of Zoonosis of Ministry of Agriculture College of Veterinary Medicine, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China. sheruiping@126.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7604-1680
Yue ZhaoDepartment of Veterinary Pathology and Public Health, Key Laboratory of Zoonosis of Ministry of Agriculture College of Veterinary Medicine, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China.
Yifei YangDepartment of Veterinary Pathology and Public Health, Key Laboratory of Zoonosis of Ministry of Agriculture College of Veterinary Medicine, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China.
Meikun ZhangBeijing Huadu Broiler Corporations, Beijing, 102211, China.
Fang DuDepartment of Veterinary Pathology and Public Health, Key Laboratory of Zoonosis of Ministry of Agriculture College of Veterinary Medicine, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China.
Majid Hussain SoomroDepartment of Veterinary Pathology and Public Health, Key Laboratory of Zoonosis of Ministry of Agriculture College of Veterinary Medicine, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China.
Ruihan ShiDepartment of Veterinary Pathology and Public Health, Key Laboratory of Zoonosis of Ministry of Agriculture College of Veterinary Medicine, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHemoglobin is a rich source of biological peptides. As a byproduct and even wastewater of poultry-slaughtering facilities, chicken blood is one of the most abundant source of hemoglobin.

resultsIn this study, the chicken hemoglobin antimicrobial peptides (CHAP) were isolated and the antimicrobial and bactericidal activities were tested by the agarose diffusion assay, minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) analysis, minimal bactericidal concentration (MBC) analysis, and time-dependent inhibitory and bactericidal assays. The results demonstrated that CHAP had potent and rapid antimicrobial activity against 19 bacterial strains, including 9 multidrug-resistant bacterial strains. Bacterial biofilm and NaCl permeability assays, transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) were further performed to detect the mechanism of its antimicrobial effect. Additionally, CHAP showed low hemolytic activity, embryo toxicity, and high stability in different temperatures and animal plasma.

conclusionCHAP may have great potential for expanding production and development value in animal medication, the breeding industry and environment protection.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Infective AgentsAntimicrobial Cationic PeptidesBacteriaBacteriolysisBiofilmsBlood Bactericidal ActivityCell Membrane PermeabilityChickensDrug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialHemoglobinsHemolytic AgentsMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMicroscopy, Electron, ScanningMicroscopy, Electron, TransmissionAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Infective AgentsAntimicrobial Cationic PeptidesHemoglobinsHemolytic AgentsPeptide FragmentsSodium ChlorideAntimicrobial activityAntimicrobial peptidesBactericidal activityHemoglobinHydrolysis

Identifiers

PMID27919228
PMCPMC5139128

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.