Trial reportBMC neurology2016
Capsaicin 8% patch repeat treatment plus standard of care (SOC) versus SOC alone in painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy: a randomised, 52-week, open-label, safety study.
Trial report in BMC neurology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01478607 (A Randomized, Controlled, Long-term Safety Study Evaluating the Effect of Repeated Applications of QUTENZATM Plus Standard of Care Versus Standard of Care Alone in Subjects With Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy), which is not on this map. Cited by 51 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Randomized, Controlled, Long-term Safety Study Evaluating the Effect of Repeated Applications of QUTENZATM Plus Standard of Care Versus Standard of Care Alone in Subjects With Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy
Who cites it
51 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 102 citations in OpenAlex.
- American Association of Clinical Endocrinology Clinical Practice Guideline: Developing a Diabetes Mellitus Comprehensive Care Plan-2022 Update.Endocrine practice : official journal of the American College of Endocrinology and the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists · 2022Guideline
- Different Drugs for the Treatment of Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy: A Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in neurology · 2021Pooled it
- Quality of Life in Painful Peripheral Neuropathies: A Systematic Review.Pain research & management · 2019Pooled it
- Effect of Capsaicin (8%) Topical System on Sensory Function in Patients With Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy: Analysis of the PACE Study.Muscle & nerve · 2026Trial
- Is the Capsaicin 179 mg (8% w/w) Cutaneous Patch an Appropriate Treatment Option for Older Patients with Peripheral Neuropathic Pain?Journal of pain research · 2024Trial
- Considerations on the Obstacles That Lead to Slow Recruitment in a Pain Management Clinical Trial: Experiences from the Belgian PELICAN (PrEgabalin Lidocaine Capsaicin Neuropathic Pain) Pragmatic Study.Pain research & management · 2023Trial
- Superiority of capsaicin 8% patch versus oral pregabalin on dynamic mechanical allodynia in patients with peripheral neuropathic pain.European journal of pain (London, England) · 2018Trial
- Effectiveness of the capsaicin 8% patch in the management of peripheral neuropathic pain in European clinical practice: the ASCEND study.BMC neurology · 2017Trial
- Trial
- Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of Treatments for Chronic Peripheral Neuropathic Pain: A Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis.Pain and therapy · 2026Review
- Procedural Optimization of Capsaicin 8% Patch Therapy Using Ultrasound-Guided Bilateral Ankle Nerve Block in Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy: A Retrospective Comparative Cohort Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- TRPV1 Receptor Modulators: Emerging Therapies for Neuropathic, Osteoarthritic, and Perioperative Pain.CNS drugs · 2026Review
- Topical analgesics for neuropathic pain: an evidence-informed guide for the practicing clinician.Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.) · 2026Review
- Response to High-Dose Topical Capsaicin in Neuropathic Pain: Absence of Deep Pain as a Predictor of Analgesic Effect.European journal of pain (London, England) · 2026Article
- Cost-Effectiveness of a High-Concentration (179 mg) Capsaicin Patch for the Treatment of Patients with Peripheral Neuropathic Pain in Scotland.Pain and therapy · 2025Article
- Article
- CASPAR: a retrospective cohort study of the high-concentration capsaicin topical system in patients with painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy of the feet.BMJ open diabetes research & care · 2025Article
- Review
- Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy: Pathophysiology and New Insights into the Mechanism of Action of High-Concentration Topical Capsaicin.Journal of experimental pharmacology · 2025Review
- Real-world 12-month outcomes of repeated high-concentration capsaicin patch in chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy: results from the CASPAR study.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis 52-week study evaluated the long-term safety and tolerability of capsaicin 8% w/w (179 mg) patch repeat treatment plus standard of care (SOC) versus SOC alone in painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy (PDPN).
methodsPhase 3, multinational, open-label, randomised, controlled, 52-week safety study, conducted in Europe. Patients were randomised to capsaicin 8% patch repeat treatment (30 or 60 min; 1-7 treatments with ≥ 8-week intervals) to painful areas of the feet plus SOC, or SOC alone. The primary objective was the safety of capsaicin 8% patch repeat treatment (30 min and 60 min applications) plus SOC versus SOC alone over 52 weeks, assessed by changes in Norfolk Quality of Life-Diabetic Neuropathy (QOL-DN) total score from baseline to end of study (EOS). Secondary safety endpoints included Utah Early Neuropathy Scale (UENS) assessments and standardised testing of sensory perception and reflex function.
resultsOverall, 468 patients were randomised (30 min plus SOC, n = 156; 60 min plus SOC, n = 157; SOC alone, n = 155). By EoS, mean changes in Norfolk QOL-DN total score from baseline [estimated mean difference versus SOC alone; 90% CI for difference] were: 30 min plus SOC, -27.6% [-20.9; -31.7, -10.1]; 60 min plus SOC, -32.8% [-26.1; -36.8, -15.4]; SOC alone, -6.7%. Mean changes [difference versus SOC alone] in UENS total score by EoS versus baseline were: 30 min plus SOC, -2.1 [-0.9; -1.8, 0.1]; 60 min plus SOC, -3.0 [-1.7; -2.7, -0.8]; SOC alone, -1.2. No detrimental deterioration was observed in any of the Norfolk or UENS subscales by EoS with capsaicin. Also, no worsening in sensory perception testing of sharp, warm, cold and vibration stimuli was found with capsaicin by EoS. Capsaicin treatment was well tolerated and the most frequent treatment-emergent adverse events were application site pain (30 min, 28.2%; 60 min, 29.3%), burning sensation (30 min, 9.0%; 60 min, 9.6%) and application site erythema (30 min, 7.7%; 60 min, 8.9%).
conclusionIn patients with PDPN, capsaicin 8% patch repeat treatment plus SOC over 52 weeks was well tolerated with no negative functional or neurological effects compared with SOC alone.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT01478607 . Date of registration November 21, 2011; retrospectively registered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.