Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27919222›Full record

Trial reportBMC neurology2016

Capsaicin 8% patch repeat treatment plus standard of care (SOC) versus SOC alone in painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy: a randomised, 52-week, open-label, safety study.

Aaron I Vinik, Serge Perrot, Etta J Vinik, Ladislav Pazdera, Hélène Jacobs, Malcolm Stoker, Stephen K Long, Robert J Snijder, Marjolijne van der Stoep, Enrique Ortega and 1 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC neurology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01478607 (A Randomized, Controlled, Long-term Safety Study Evaluating the Effect of Repeated Applications of QUTENZATM Plus Standard of Care Versus Standard of Care Alone in Subjects With Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy), which is not on this map. Cited by 51 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01478607 phase3completednot on this map

A Randomized, Controlled, Long-term Safety Study Evaluating the Effect of Repeated Applications of QUTENZATM Plus Standard of Care Versus Standard of Care Alone in Subjects With Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy

TypeinterventionalSponsorAstellas Pharma IncRan2011 to 2014Enrolled468ConditionsPainful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy (PDPN)ArmsQUTENZA
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 102 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. American Association of Clinical Endocrinology Clinical Practice Guideline: Developing a Diabetes Mellitus Comprehensive Care Plan-2022 Update.Endocrine practice : official journal of the American College of Endocrinology and the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists · 2022
    Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.

Aaron I VinikEastern Virginia Medical School, Strelitz Diabetes Center, 855 W Brambleton Avenue, Room 2018, Norfolk, VA, 23510, USA. vinikai@evms.edu.
Serge PerrotHôpital Hôtel Dieu, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France.
Etta J VinikEastern Virginia Medical School, Strelitz Diabetes Center, 855 W Brambleton Avenue, Room 2018, Norfolk, VA, 23510, USA.
Ladislav PazderaVestra Clinics - Dedicated Research Clinics, Rychnov nad Kneznou, Czech Republic.
Hélène JacobsAstellas Pharma Europe B. V, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Malcolm StokerAstellas Pharma Europe B. V, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Stephen K LongAstellas Pharma Europe B. V, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Robert J SnijderAstellas Pharma Europe B. V, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Marjolijne van der StoepAstellas Pharma Europe B. V, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Enrique OrtegaHospital Rio Hortega, Valladolid, Spain.
Nathaniel KatzAnalgesic Solutions, Natick, MA, USA.
Astellas Pharma (Netherlands) · NLEastern Virginia Medical School · USClinical Solutions · USHospital Universitario Río Hortega · ESUniversité Paris Cité · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis 52-week study evaluated the long-term safety and tolerability of capsaicin 8% w/w (179 mg) patch repeat treatment plus standard of care (SOC) versus SOC alone in painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy (PDPN).

methodsPhase 3, multinational, open-label, randomised, controlled, 52-week safety study, conducted in Europe. Patients were randomised to capsaicin 8% patch repeat treatment (30 or 60 min; 1-7 treatments with ≥ 8-week intervals) to painful areas of the feet plus SOC, or SOC alone. The primary objective was the safety of capsaicin 8% patch repeat treatment (30 min and 60 min applications) plus SOC versus SOC alone over 52 weeks, assessed by changes in Norfolk Quality of Life-Diabetic Neuropathy (QOL-DN) total score from baseline to end of study (EOS). Secondary safety endpoints included Utah Early Neuropathy Scale (UENS) assessments and standardised testing of sensory perception and reflex function.

resultsOverall, 468 patients were randomised (30 min plus SOC, n = 156; 60 min plus SOC, n = 157; SOC alone, n = 155). By EoS, mean changes in Norfolk QOL-DN total score from baseline [estimated mean difference versus SOC alone; 90% CI for difference] were: 30 min plus SOC, -27.6% [-20.9; -31.7, -10.1]; 60 min plus SOC, -32.8% [-26.1; -36.8, -15.4]; SOC alone, -6.7%. Mean changes [difference versus SOC alone] in UENS total score by EoS versus baseline were: 30 min plus SOC, -2.1 [-0.9; -1.8, 0.1]; 60 min plus SOC, -3.0 [-1.7; -2.7, -0.8]; SOC alone, -1.2. No detrimental deterioration was observed in any of the Norfolk or UENS subscales by EoS with capsaicin. Also, no worsening in sensory perception testing of sharp, warm, cold and vibration stimuli was found with capsaicin by EoS. Capsaicin treatment was well tolerated and the most frequent treatment-emergent adverse events were application site pain (30 min, 28.2%; 60 min, 29.3%), burning sensation (30 min, 9.0%; 60 min, 9.6%) and application site erythema (30 min, 7.7%; 60 min, 8.9%).

conclusionIn patients with PDPN, capsaicin 8% patch repeat treatment plus SOC over 52 weeks was well tolerated with no negative functional or neurological effects compared with SOC alone.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT01478607 . Date of registration November 21, 2011; retrospectively registered.

Indexed as

Outcome Assessment, Health CareStandard of CareAdministration, CutaneousAdultAgedCapsaicinDiabetic NeuropathiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeuralgiaSensory System AgentsCapsaicinSensory System AgentsCapsaicin 8% patchNorfolk QOL-DNPainful diabetic peripheral neuropathyTPRV1UENS

Identifiers

PMID27919222
PMCPMC5139122
OpenAlexW2559822579

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.