Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27919120›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2016

Reconstructive surgery for treating pressure ulcers.

Jason Kf Wong, Kavit Amin, Jo C Dumville

Open access · bronzeAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
10.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Reconstructive surgery for treating pressure ulcers.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Reconstructive surgery for treating pressure ulcers.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016
    Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Flap Survival after Reconstructive Surgery for Pressure Ulcers: A Cohort Study.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2023
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Management of Chronic Non-healing Wounds by Hirudotherapy.World journal of plastic surgery · 2017
    Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jason Kf WongPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital South Manchester, Southmoor Road, Wythenshawe, Manchester, UK, M23 9LT.
Kavit AminPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital South Manchester, Southmoor Road, Wythenshawe, Manchester, UK, M23 9LT.
Jo C DumvilleDivision of Nursing, Midwifery & Social Work, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine & Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK, M13 9PL.
Wythenshawe Hospital · GBUniversity of Manchester · GB

Funding

Department of Health 13/89/08
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe management of pressure ulcers involves several interventions ranging from pressure-relieving measures such as repositioning, to treatments that can include reconstructive surgery. Such surgery may be considered for recalcitrant wounds when full thickness skin loss arises and deeper structures such as muscle fascia and even bone are exposed. The surgery commonly involves wound debridement followed by the addition of new tissue into the wound. Whilst reconstructive surgery is an accepted means of ulcer management, the benefits and harms of surgery compared with non-surgical treatments, or alternative surgical approaches are not clear.

objectivesTo assess the effects of reconstructive surgery for healing pressure ulcers (stage II or above), comparing surgery with no surgery or comparing alternative forms of surgery in any care setting. SEARCH

methodsWe searched the following electronic databases to identify reports of relevant randomised clinical trials (searched 26 September 2016): the Cochrane Wounds Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and CINAHL. We also searched three clinical trials registers and reference lists of relevant systematic reviews, meta-analyses and health technology assessment reports. SELECTION CRITERIA: Published or unpublished randomised controlled trials that assessed reconstructive surgery in the treatment of pressure ulcers. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently performed study selection. We planned that two review authors would also assess the risk of bias and extract study data. MAIN

resultsWe did not identify any studies that met the review eligibility criteria nor any registered studies investigating the role of reconstructive surgery in the management of pressure ulcers. AUTHORS'

conclusionsCurrently there is no randomised evidence that supports or refutes the role of reconstructive surgery in pressure ulcer management. This is a priority area and there is a need to explore this intervention with more rigorous and robust research.

Indexed as

Plastic Surgery ProceduresWound HealingHumansPatient PositioningPressure Ulcer

Identifiers

PMID27919120
PMCPMC6463961
OpenAlexW2224220040

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.