Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27918951›Full record

ArticleDrug and alcohol dependence2017

Subjective alcohol responses in a cross-sectional, field-based study of adolescents and young adults: Effects of age, drinking level, and dependence/consequences.

Hayley Treloar, Mark A Celio, Stephen A Lisman, Robert Miranda, Linda P Spear

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug and alcohol dependence, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Individual Variables Involved in Perceived Pressure for Adolescent Drinking.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hayley TreloarCenter for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, United States. Electronic address: hayley_treloar@brown.edu.
Mark A CelioCenter for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, United States.
Stephen A LismanDepartment of Psychology, Binghamton University (SUNY), Binghamton, NY 13902-6000, United States.
Robert MirandaCenter for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, United States.
Linda P SpearDepartment of Psychology, Binghamton University (SUNY), Binghamton, NY 13902-6000, United States.

Funding

ALCOHOL INTERVENTION/TREATMENT OUTCOME RESEARCH TRAININGT32AA007459 · NIAAA · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI ROBERT MIRANDA, PETER M. MONTI · 1986 to 2026
$13.3M
NALTREXONE, CRAVING AND DRINKING: ECOLOGICAL ASSESSMENTR01AA007850 · NIAAA · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI MIRANDA, ROBERT · 1988 to 2015
$8.4M
Effects of Acute Alcohol on Sex-Specific Delay Discounting and Subsequent Sexual Decision Making among MSMK08AA024056 · NIAAA · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI CELIO, MARK ANTHONY · 2016 to 2018
$571k
NIAAA NIH HHS K08 AA024056NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA007850NIAAA NIH HHS T32 AA007459
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdolescents are physically, cognitively, socially, and emotionally different than adults in ways that may partially explain why alcohol misuse typically develops during this period. Ample animal-science evidence and nascent ecological evidence points toward developmentally limited differences in sensitivity to alcohol's stimulatory and sedative effects. Field-based research methods were used to test for such age-related differences in a sample of adolescents through young adults. Potential moderating influences of estimated blood alcohol content (eBAC), as well as typical consumption and level of dependence/consequences were explored.

methodsSubjective alcohol responses were collected from 1,364 participants, aged 17 to 32 years, recruited outside of venues where drinking takes place in a small metropolitan bar district.

resultsSelf-reports of stimulatory response to alcohol were age-related, such that younger participants reported increased subjective stimulation at the time of data collection relative to older participants. Age-related differences in stimulatory responses were more pronounced at lower eBACs and among younger participants who typically drank more heavily. Stimulatory responses generally diminished among older than younger participants, although individuals with greater dependence/consequences consistently reported greater stimulation from drinking. Contrastingly, age, typical consumption, and dependence/consequences were not related to sedation in this sample.

conclusionsThis research provides cross-sectional evidence to support age-, consumption-, and dependence/consequences-related differences in stimulatory alcohol responses among adolescents and young adults assessed within a bar-area context. While cross-sectional, the results of this field-based study provide support for the theory that addiction liability is developmentally linked and associated, in part, with age-related differences in subjective alcohol responses.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAge FactorsAlcohol DrinkingAlcoholismCross-Sectional StudiesEmotionsEthanolFemaleHumansHypnotics and SedativesMaleYoung AdultEthanolHypnotics and SedativesAdolescentAlcoholAlcohol problemsField-based studyStimulationSubjective responses

Identifiers

PMID27918951
PMCPMC5218599

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.