Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27918797›Full record

ReviewJournal of biomechanical engineering2017

The Nuclear Option: Evidence Implicating the Cell Nucleus in Mechanotransduction.

Spencer E Szczesny, Robert L Mauck

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of biomechanical engineering, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Aspects of plant intelligence (ii).Plant signaling & behavior · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Natural Killer Cell Mechanosensing in Solid Tumors.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  13. Nuclear compression regulates YAP spatiotemporal fluctuations in living cells.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Mechanics and functional consequences of nuclear deformations.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2022
    Review
  17. The Elephant in the Cell: Nuclear Mechanics and Mechanobiology.Journal of biomechanical engineering · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Spencer E SzczesnyDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, 424 Stemmler Hall, 36th Street and Hamilton Walk, Philadelphia, PA 19104; Translational Musculoskeletal Research Center, Corporal Michael J. Crescenz Veterans Affairs Medical Center, 3900 Woodland Avenue, Philadelphia, PA 19104.
Robert L MauckDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, 424 Stemmler Hall, 36th Street and Hamilton Walk, Philadelphia, PA 19104; Translational Musculoskeletal Research Center, Corporal Michael J. Crescenz Veterans Affairs Medical Center, 3900 Woodland Avenue, Philadelphia, PA 19104;Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, 240 Skirkanich Hall, 210 South 33rd Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104 e-mail: lemauck@mail.med.upenn.edu.
Philadelphia VA Medical Center · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

Dynamic Fibrous Scaffolds for Repairing Dense Connective TissuesR01AR056624 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Jason A Burdick, Robert L Mauck · 2009 to 2026
$7.5M
Training in Muscle Biology and Muscle DiseaseT32AR053461 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI OSTAP, E. MICHAEL · 2006 to 2025
$4.9M
Multi-scale biomechanics of engineered and native fibrous load-bearing tissueR01EB002425 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI ELLIOTT, DAWN M, MAUCK, ROBERT L · 2003 to 2017
$4.1M
Role of Mechanical Loading and Stem Cell Mechanotransduction in Tendon DegenerationF32AR070562 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI SZCZESNY, SPENCER · 2016 to 2017
$65k
NIAMS NIH HHS F32 AR070562NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR056624NIAMS NIH HHS T32 AR053461NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB002425
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biophysical stimuli presented to cells via microenvironmental properties (e.g., alignment and stiffness) or external forces have a significant impact on cell function and behavior. Recently, the cell nucleus has been identified as a mechanosensitive organelle that contributes to the perception and response to mechanical stimuli. However, the specific mechanotransduction mechanisms that mediate these effects have not been clearly established. Here, we offer a comprehensive review of the evidence supporting (and refuting) three hypothetical nuclear mechanotransduction mechanisms: physical reorganization of chromatin, signaling at the nuclear envelope, and altered cytoskeletal structure/tension due to nuclear remodeling. Our goal is to provide a reference detailing the progress that has been made and the areas that still require investigation regarding the role of nuclear mechanotransduction in cell biology. Additionally, we will briefly discuss the role that mathematical models of cell mechanics can play in testing these hypotheses and in elucidating how biophysical stimulation of the nucleus drives changes in cell behavior. While force-induced alterations in signaling pathways involving lamina-associated polypeptides (LAPs) (e.g., emerin and histone deacetylase 3 (HDAC3)) and transcription factors (TFs) located at the nuclear envelope currently appear to be the most clearly supported mechanism of nuclear mechanotransduction, additional work is required to examine this process in detail and to more fully test alternative mechanisms. The combination of sophisticated experimental techniques and advanced mathematical models is necessary to enhance our understanding of the role of the nucleus in the mechanotransduction processes driving numerous critical cell functions.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAnimalsCell NucleusChromatinCompressive StrengthComputer SimulationCytoskeletonElastic ModulusHumansMechanotransduction, CellularNuclear EnvelopeStress, MechanicalChromatin

Identifiers

PMID27918797
PMCPMC5395915
OpenAlexW2560807219

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.