ArticlePLoS computational biology2016
A Graph-Centric Approach for Metagenome-Guided Peptide and Protein Identification in Metaproteomics.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed.
- Combined NGS and proteomics improves viral diagnostics in wildlife: coronaviruses confirmed in hedgehogs.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
- Biochanin A improves nitrogen utilization efficiency by regulating ruminal microbial community in dairy goats.Microbiome · 2025Article
- Modulation of chicken gut microbiota for enhanced productivity and health: A review.Veterinary world · 2024Review
- Animal Wellness: The Power of Multiomics and Integrative Strategies: Multiomics in Improving Animal Health.Veterinary medicine international · 2024Review
- Article
- Metaproteomics reveals functional partitioning and vegetational variation among permafrost-affected Arctic soil bacterial communities.mSystems · 2023Article
- MetaNovo: An open-source pipeline for probabilistic peptide discovery in complex metaproteomic datasets.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- IntegratedNAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2023Article
- MetaProD: A Highly-Configurable Mass Spectrometry Analyzer for Multiplexed Proteomic and Metaproteomic Data.Journal of proteome research · 2023Article
- Review
- Activity- and Enrichment-Based Metaproteomics Insights into Active Urease from the Rumen Microbiota of Cattle.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Metaproteomics-An Advantageous Option in Studies of Host-Microbiota Interaction.Microorganisms · 2021Article
- Using high-abundance proteins as guides for fast and effective peptide/protein identification from human gut metaproteomic data.Microbiome · 2021Article
- Roles of bacteriophages, plasmids and CRISPR immunity in microbial community dynamics revealed using time-series integrated meta-omics.Nature microbiology · 2021Article
- Soil Metaproteomics for the Study of the Relationships Between Microorganisms and Plants: A Review of Extraction Protocols and Ecological Insights.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
- Integration of time-series meta-omics data reveals how microbial ecosystems respond to disturbance.Nature communications · 2020Article
- A complete and flexible workflow for metaproteomics data analysis based on MetaProteomeAnalyzer and Prophane.Nature protocols · 2020Article
- A Meta-proteogenomic Approach to Peptide Identification Incorporating Assembly Uncertainty and Genomic Variation.Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2019Article
- A Bioinformatics Guide to Plant Microbiome Analysis.Frontiers in plant science · 2019Review
- ProteoStorm: An Ultrafast Metaproteomics Database Search Framework.Cell systems · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Metaproteomic studies adopt the common bottom-up proteomics approach to investigate the protein composition and the dynamics of protein expression in microbial communities. When matched metagenomic and/or metatranscriptomic data of the microbial communities are available, metaproteomic data analyses often employ a metagenome-guided approach, in which complete or fragmental protein-coding genes are first directly predicted from metagenomic (and/or metatranscriptomic) sequences or from their assemblies, and the resulting protein sequences are then used as the reference database for peptide/protein identification from MS/MS spectra. This approach is often limited because protein coding genes predicted from metagenomes are incomplete and fragmental. In this paper, we present a graph-centric approach to improving metagenome-guided peptide and protein identification in metaproteomics. Our method exploits the de Bruijn graph structure reported by metagenome assembly algorithms to generate a comprehensive database of protein sequences encoded in the community. We tested our method using several public metaproteomic datasets with matched metagenomic and metatranscriptomic sequencing data acquired from complex microbial communities in a biological wastewater treatment plant. The results showed that many more peptides and proteins can be identified when assembly graphs were utilized, improving the characterization of the proteins expressed in the microbial communities. The additional proteins we identified contribute to the characterization of important pathways such as those involved in degradation of chemical hazards. Our tools are released as open-source software on github at https://github.com/COL-IU/Graph2Pro.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.