Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27918538›Full record

ArticleNature genetics2017

Variation in the flowering gene SELF PRUNING 5G promotes day-neutrality and early yield in tomato.

Sebastian Soyk, Niels A Müller, Soon Ju Park, Inga Schmalenbach, Ke Jiang, Ryosuke Hayama, Lei Zhang, Joyce Van Eck, José M Jiménez-Gómez, Zachary B Lippman

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature genetics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 177 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
177citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

177 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Florigen and Florigen-Like Genes Regulate Temperature-Responsive Flowering in Tomato.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

117 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Sebastian SoykCold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York, USA.
Niels A MüllerDepartment of Plant Breeding and Genetics, Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, Cologne, Germany.
Soon Ju ParkDivision of Biological Sciences, Wonkwang University, Iksan, Republic of Korea.
Inga SchmalenbachDepartment of Plant Breeding and Genetics, Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, Cologne, Germany.
Ke JiangCold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York, USA.
Ryosuke HayamaDepartment of Plant Developmental Biology, Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, Cologne, Germany.
Lei ZhangDepartment of Plant Breeding and Genetics, Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, Cologne, Germany.
Joyce Van EckThe Boyce Thompson Institute, Ithaca, New York, USA.
José M Jiménez-GómezDepartment of Plant Breeding and Genetics, Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, Cologne, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5033-7192
Zachary B LippmanCold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plants evolved so that their flowering is triggered by seasonal changes in day length. However, day-length sensitivity in crops limits their geographical range of cultivation, and thus modification of the photoperiod response was critical for their domestication. Here we show that loss of day-length-sensitive flowering in tomato was driven by the florigen paralog and flowering repressor SELF-PRUNING 5G (SP5G). SP5G expression is induced to high levels during long days in wild species, but not in cultivated tomato because of cis-regulatory variation. CRISPR/Cas9-engineered mutations in SP5G cause rapid flowering and enhance the compact determinate growth habit of field tomatoes, resulting in a quick burst of flower production that translates to an early yield. Our findings suggest that pre-existing variation in SP5G facilitated the expansion of cultivated tomato beyond its origin near the equator in South America, and they provide a compelling demonstration of the power of gene editing to rapidly improve yield traits in crop breeding.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, PlantCRISPR-Cas SystemsFlowersMutationPhenotypePlant ProteinsPlants, Genetically ModifiedRegulatory Sequences, Nucleic AcidSolanum lycopersicumTime FactorsPlant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID27918538

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.