Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27918466›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of environmental research and public health2016

Evaluating a Website to Teach Children Safety with Dogs: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

David C Schwebel, Peng Li, Leslie A McClure, Joan Severson

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Pediatric dog bite injuries in the USA: a systematic review.World journal of pediatric surgery · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

David C SchwebelUAB Youth Safety Lab, Department of Psychology, College of Arts and Sciences, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA. schwebel@uab.edu.
Peng LiDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA. pli@uab.edu.
Leslie A McClureDepartment of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Dornsife School of Public Health, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA. lam439@drexel.edu.
Joan SeversonDigital Artefacts, LLC, Iowa City, IA 52240, USA. joan@digitalartefacts.com.

Funding

A Website to Teach Children Safety with Dogs: Development and EvaluationR21HD075960 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI SCHWEBEL, DAVID C · 2014 to 2015
$391k
NICHD NIH HHS R21 HD075960
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dog bites represent a significant threat to child health. Theory-driven interventions scalable for broad dissemination are sparse. A website was developed to teach children dog safety via increased knowledge, improved cognitive skills in relevant domains, and increased perception of vulnerability to bites. A randomized controlled trial was conducted with 69 children aged 4-5 randomly assigned to use the dog safety website or a control transportation safety website for ~3 weeks. Assessment of dog safety knowledge and behavior plus skill in three relevant cognitive constructs (impulse control, noticing details, and perspective-taking) was conducted both at baseline and following website use. The dog safety website incorporated interactive games, instructional videos including testimonials, a motivational rewards system, and messaging to parents concerning child lessons. Our results showed that about two-thirds of the intervention sample was not adherent to website use at home, so both intent-to-treat and per-protocol analyses were conducted. Intent-to-treat analyses yielded mostly null results. Per-protocol analyses suggested children compliant to the intervention protocol scored higher on knowledge and recognition of safe behavior with dogs following the intervention compared to the control group. Adherent children also had improved scores post-intervention on the cognitive skill of noticing details compared to the control group. We concluded that young children's immature cognition can lead to dog bites. Interactive eHealth training on websites shows potential to teach children relevant cognitive and safety skills to reduce risk. Compliance to website use is a challenge, and some relevant cognitive skills (e.g., noticing details) may be more amenable to computer-based training than others (e.g., impulse control).

Indexed as

Child WelfareDogsInternetSafetyAnimalsBites and StingsChild DevelopmentChild, PreschoolFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth PromotionHumansMaleOutcome Assessment, Health CarePatient Compliancecognitive developmentdog biteehealthpreventionsafetywebsite

Identifiers

PMID27918466
PMCPMC5201339

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.