Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27918457›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of environmental research and public health2016

Air Quality Strategies on Public Health and Health Equity in Europe-A Systematic Review.

Li Wang, Buqing Zhong, Sotiris Vardoulakis, Fengying Zhang, Eva Pilot, Yonghua Li, Linsheng Yang, Wuyi Wang, Thomas Krafft

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. The impact of prenatal exposure to PMEnvironmental science and pollution research international · 2020
    Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Investigating inequalities in NOInternational journal for equity in health · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Climate Solutions Double as Health Interventions.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Li WangFaculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht 6200 MD, The Netherlands. li.wang@maastrichtuniversity.nl.
Buqing ZhongState Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China. zhongbq@craes.org.cn.
Sotiris VardoulakisEnvironmental Change Department, Centre for Radiation, Chemical and Environmental Hazards, Public Health England, London WC1E 7HT, UK. Sotiris.Vardoulakis@phe.gov.uk.
Fengying ZhangDepartment of Environmental Quality Comprehensive Assessment, China National Environmental Monitoring Center, Beijing 100012, China. zhangfy@cnemc.cn.
Eva PilotFaculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht 6200 MD, The Netherlands. eva.pilot@maastrichtuniversity.nl.
Yonghua LiKey Laboratory of Land Surface Pattern and Simulation, Institute of Geographical Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China. yhli@igsnrr.ac.cn.
Linsheng YangKey Laboratory of Land Surface Pattern and Simulation, Institute of Geographical Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China. yangls@igsnrr.ac.cn.
Wuyi WangKey Laboratory of Land Surface Pattern and Simulation, Institute of Geographical Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China. wangwy@igsnrr.ac.cn.
Thomas KrafftFaculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht 6200 MD, The Netherlands. thomas.krafft@maastrichtuniversity.nl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Air pollution is an important public health problem in Europe and there is evidence that it exacerbates health inequities. This calls for effective strategies and targeted interventions. In this study, we conducted a systematic review to evaluate the effectiveness of strategies relating to air pollution control on public health and health equity in Europe. Three databases, Web of Science, PubMed, and Trials Register of Promoting Health Interventions (TRoPHI), were searched for scientific publications investigating the effectiveness of strategies on outdoor air pollution control, public health and health equity in Europe from 1995 to 2015. A total of 15 scientific papers were included in the review after screening 1626 articles. Four groups of strategy types, namely, general regulations on air quality control, road traffic related emission control interventions, energy generation related emission control interventions and greenhouse gas emission control interventions for climate change mitigation were identified. All of the strategies reviewed reported some improvement in air quality and subsequently in public health. The reduction of the air pollutant concentrations and the reported subsequent health benefits were more significant within the geographic areas affected by traffic related interventions. Among the various traffic related interventions, low emission zones appeared to be more effective in reducing ambient nitrogen dioxide (NO₂) and particulate matter levels. Only few studies considered implications for health equity, three out of 15, and no consistent results were found indicating that these strategies could reduce health inequity associated with air pollution. Particulate matter (particularly fine particulate matter) and NO₂ were the dominant outdoor air pollutants examined in the studies in Europe in recent years. Health benefits were gained either as a direct, intended objective or as a co-benefit from all of the strategies examined, but no consistent impact on health equity from the strategies was found. The strategy types aiming to control air pollution in Europe and the health impact assessment methodology were also discussed in this review.

Indexed as

Health EquityPublic HealthAir PollutantsAir PollutionClimate ChangeEuropeHumansAir Pollutantsair qualityassessmenthealthhealth equitystrategysystematic review

Identifiers

PMID27918457
PMCPMC5201337

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.