Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27918432›Full record

ReviewToxins2016

Recent Advances and Future Challenges in Modified Mycotoxin Analysis: Why HRMS Has Become a Key Instrument in Food Contaminant Research.

Laura Righetti, Giuseppe Paglia, Gianni Galaverna, Chiara Dall'Asta

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Toxins, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Predicted Aflatoxin BToxins · 2021
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Toxicology reports · 2021
    Review
  17. Quality of Dietary Supplements Containing Plant-Derived Ingredients Reconsidered by Microbiological Approach.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Review
  18. Toxins · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Toxins · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Laura RighettiDepartment of Food Science, University of Parma, Parco Area delle Scienze 95/A, Parma 43124, Italy. laura.righetti1@studenti.unipr.it.
Giuseppe PagliaCenter of Biomedicine, European Academy of Bolzano/Bozen, Via Galvani 31, Bolzano 39100, Italy. beppepaglia@gmail.com.
Gianni GalavernaDepartment of Food Science, University of Parma, Parco Area delle Scienze 95/A, Parma 43124, Italy. gianni.galaverna@unipr.it.
Chiara Dall'AstaDepartment of Food Science, University of Parma, Parco Area delle Scienze 95/A, Parma 43124, Italy. chiara.dallasta@unipr.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mycotoxins are secondary metabolites produced by pathogenic fungi in crops worldwide. These compounds can undergo modification in plants, leading to the formation of a large number of possible modified forms, whose toxicological relevance and occurrence in food and feed is still largely unexplored. The analysis of modified mycotoxins by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry remains a challenge because of their chemical diversity, the large number of isomeric forms, and the lack of analytical standards. Here, the potential benefits of high-resolution and ion mobility mass spectrometry as a tool for separation and structure confirmation of modified mycotoxins have been investigated/reviewed.

Indexed as

AnimalsChromatography, LiquidFood ContaminationHumansMass SpectrometryMolecular StructureMycotoxinsMycotoxinshigh resolution mass spectrometryion mobility spectrometrymodified mycotoxins

Identifiers

PMID27918432
PMCPMC5198555

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.