Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27918262›Full record

ArticleEuro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin2016

Prevalence and correlates of vaccine hesitancy among general practitioners: a cross-sectional telephone survey in France, April to July 2014.

Pierre Verger, Fanny Collange, Lisa Fressard, Aurélie Bocquier, Arnaud Gautier, Céline Pulcini, Jocelyn Raude, Patrick Peretti-Watel

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
11.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 84 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Understanding Primary Care Physician Vaccination Behaviour: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Pierre VergerINSERM, UMR912 'Economics and Social Sciences Applied to Health and Analysis of Medical Information' (SESSTIM), Marseille, France.
Fanny CollangeINSERM, UMR912 'Economics and Social Sciences Applied to Health and Analysis of Medical Information' (SESSTIM), Marseille, France.
Lisa FressardINSERM, UMR912 'Economics and Social Sciences Applied to Health and Analysis of Medical Information' (SESSTIM), Marseille, France.
Aurélie BocquierINSERM, UMR912 'Economics and Social Sciences Applied to Health and Analysis of Medical Information' (SESSTIM), Marseille, France.
Arnaud GautierSanté publique France (the French national public health agency), Saint-Maurice, France.
Céline PulciniCHU de Nancy, Service de Maladies Infectieuses et Tropicales, Hôpitaux de Brabois, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France.
Jocelyn RaudeEHESP, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Rennes, France.
Patrick Peretti-WatelINSERM, UMR912 'Economics and Social Sciences Applied to Health and Analysis of Medical Information' (SESSTIM), Marseille, France.
Inserm · FRCentre Hospitalier Régional et Universitaire de Nancy · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRÉcole des Hautes Études en Santé Publique · FRSanté Publique France · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article sought to estimate the prevalence of vaccine hesitancy (VH) among French general practitioners (GPs) and to study its demographic, professional and personal correlates. We conducted a cross-sectional telephone survey about GPs' vaccination-related attitudes and practices in 2014 in a national panel of 1,712 GPs in private practice, randomly selected from an exhaustive database of health professionals in France. A cluster analysis of various dimensions of VH (self-reported vaccine recommendations, perceptions of vaccine risks and usefulness) identified three clusters: 86% of GPs (95% confidence interval (CI): 84-88) were not or only slightly vaccine-hesitant, 11% (95% CI: 9-12) moderately hesitant and 3% (95% CI: 3-4) highly hesitant or opposed to vaccination. GPs in the latter two clusters were less frequently vaccinated and reported occasional practice of alternative medicine more often than those in the first cluster; they also described less experience with vaccine-preventable diseases and more experience with patients who they considered had serious adverse effects from vaccination. This study confirms the presence of VH among French GPs but also suggests that its prevalence is moderate. Given GPs' central role in vaccination, these results nevertheless call for a mobilisation of stakeholders to address VH among GPs.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFranceGeneral PractitionersHealth Care SurveysHumansIncidenceInfluenza A Virus, H1N1 SubtypeInfluenza, HumanInfluenza VaccinesMalePandemicsPractice Patterns, Physicians'PrevalenceInfluenza Vaccinesattitude of health personnelbehaviorcluster analysisgeneral practicevaccine hesitancyvaccines and immunization

Identifiers

PMID27918262
PMCPMC5291145
OpenAlexW2560696897

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.