Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27918210›Full record

ReviewExpert opinion on investigational drugs2017

Emerging therapeutic interventions against noise-induced hearing loss.

Su-Hua Sha, Jochen Schacht

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Expert opinion on investigational drugs, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
69citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
7.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

69 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 143 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. AAVR Expression is Essential for AAV Vector Transduction in Sensory Hair Cells.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Hearing Loss and Oxidative Stress: A Comprehensive Review.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Investigation of the Relationship Between Noise-Induced Hearing Loss and Metabolic Syndrome in One of the Oil Industries in the South of Iran.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2023
    Article
  20. Review

9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Su-Hua Shaa Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine , Medical University of South Carolina , Charleston , SC , USA.
Jochen Schachtb Kresge Hearing Research Institute , University of Michigan , Ann Arbor , MI , USA.
Medical University of South Carolina · USUniversity of Michigan · US

Funding

Molecular Mechanisms in Noise-Induced Hearing LossR01DC009222 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Su-Hua Sha · 2010 to 2026
$5.5M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC009222
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionNoise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) due to industrial, military, and recreational noise exposure is a major, but also potentially preventable cause of acquired hearing loss. For the United States it is estimated that 26 million people (15% of the population) between the ages of 20 and 69 have a high-frequency NIHL at a detriment to the quality of life of the affected individuals and great economic cost to society. Areas covered: This review outlines the pathology and pathophysiology of hearing loss as seen in humans and animal models. Results from molecular studies are presented that have provided the basis for therapeutic strategies successfully applied to animals. Several compounds emerging from these studies (mostly antioxidants) are now being tested in field trials. Expert opinion: Although no clinically applicable intervention has been approved yet, recent trials are encouraging. In order to maximize protective therapies, future work needs to apply stringent criteria for noise exposure and outcome parameters. Attention needs to be paid not only to permanent NIHL due to death of sensory cells but also to temporary effects that may show delayed consequences. Existing results combined with the search for efficacious new therapies should establish a viable treatment within a decade.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeAdultAgedAnimalsAntioxidantsHearing Loss, Noise-InducedHumansMiddle AgedTime FactorsYoung AdultAntioxidantsAntioxidantshair cellsmagnesiumN-acetylcysteineneurotrophinsnoise traumaoxidative stresssynaptopathyvasoconstriction

Identifiers

PMID27918210
PMCPMC5527323
OpenAlexW2560123065

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.