Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27917484›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of school health2017

To Consent or Decline HPV Vaccination: A Pilot Study at the Start of the National School-Based Vaccination Program in Sweden.

Maria Grandahl, Tanja Tydén, Ragnar Westerling, Tryggve Nevéus, Andreas Rosenblad, Erik Hedin, Marie Oscarsson

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of school health, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Is stronger religious faith associated with a greater willingness to take the COVID-19 vaccine? Evidence from Israel and Japan.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Health information, attitudes and actions at religious venues: Evidence from hajj pilgrims.International journal of disaster risk reduction : IJDRR · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Maria GrandahlDepartment of Public Health and Caring Sciences and Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Tanja TydénDepartment of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Ragnar WesterlingDepartment of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Tryggve NevéusDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Andreas RosenbladCentre for Clinical Research Västerås, Uppsala University, Västerås, Sweden.
Erik HedinDepartment of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Marie OscarssonDepartment of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Uppsala University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundParents' beliefs about human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination influence whether they allow their daughters to be vaccinated. We examined the association between parents' refusal and sociodemographic background, knowledge and beliefs about HPV, and the HPV vaccination in relation to the Health Belief Model.

methodsThe sample consisted of 200 (55%) parents of children aged 11-12 years in the Swedish national vaccination program. Data were collected using a self-reported questionnaire. Most parents (N = 186) agreed to the vaccination. Pearson's chi-square, Fisher's exact test, and the Mann-Whitney U test were used to analyze data.

resultsDeclining parents saw more risks and fewer benefits of HPV vaccination but no differences in beliefs regarding the severity or young girls' susceptibility to HPV were found. There was an association between refusing the HPV vaccine and lower acceptance of previous childhood vaccinations, and their main source of information was the Internet. Parents who declined the vaccine believed it could adversely affect condom use, the age of their daughter's sexual debut, and the number of sexual partners.

conclusionParents should have the possibility to discuss HPV and HPV vaccine with a school nurse or other health care professionals, and should have access to evidence-based information on the Internet.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdultChildCross-Sectional StudiesFathersFemaleHumansImmunization ProgramsMaleMothersPapillomavirus InfectionsPapillomavirus VaccinesParental ConsentPilot ProjectsSchool Health ServicesSelf ReportPapillomavirus VaccinesHealth Belief Modelhealth beliefsHPV vaccinationschool-based vaccination programsschool nurses

Identifiers

PMID27917484
PMCPMC5157750
OpenAlexW2559881812

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.