ArticleNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2016
Separation of Bacteria, Protozoa and Carbon Nanotubes by Density Gradient Centrifugation.
Article in Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.
- Separating pathogens from drinking water and food using magnetic nanomaterials: opportunities and challenges.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Review
- Gut microbiota contributes to polystyrene nanoplastics-induced fetal growth restriction by disturbing placental nicotinamide metabolism.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2025Article
- Laboratory preparation methods for human-derived fecal microbial suspensions for fecal microbiota transplantation: a review and standardization perspectives.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Review
- From Garden to Clinic: Plant‑Derived Exosome‑Like Nanovesicles for Precision Oxidative Stress Therapy.International journal of nanomedicine · 2025Review
- Illuminating the Tiny World: A Navigation Guide for Proper Raman Studies on Microorganisms.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Graphene-Based Coating to Mitigate Biofilm Development in Marine Environments.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Current Applications of Absolute Bacterial Quantification in Microbiome Studies and Decision-Making Regarding Different Biological Questions.Microorganisms · 2021Review
- Article
- Strategies for robust and accurate experimental approaches to quantify nanomaterial bioaccumulation across a broad range of organisms.Environmental science. Nano · 2019Article
- Increasing evidence indicates low bioaccumulation of carbon nanotubes.Environmental science. Nano · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Sustainable production and use of carbon nanotube (CNT)-enabled materials require efficient assessment of CNT environmental hazards, including the potential for CNT bioaccumulation and biomagnification in environmental receptors. Microbes, as abundant organisms responsible for nutrient cycling in soil and water, are important ecological receptors for studying the effects of CNTs. Quantification of CNT association with microbial cells requires efficient separation of CNT-associated cells from individually dispersed CNTs and CNT agglomerates. Here, we designed, optimized, and demonstrated procedures for separating bacteria (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.