ArticleIranian journal of basic medical sciences2016
Favorable effects of progesterone on skin random flap survival in rats.
Article in Iranian journal of basic medical sciences, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Protective effect of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells on the survival zone of the perforator flaps in rats.SAGE open medicine · 2024Article
- Effective treatment of intractable diseases using nanoparticles to interfere with vascular supply and angiogenic process.European journal of medical research · 2022Review
- Effect of Angiogenesis in Bone Tissue Engineering.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2022Review
- Current Status of Experimental Animal Skin Flap Models: Ischemic Preconditioning and Molecular Factors.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Solving the Puzzle: What Is the Role of Progestogens in Neovascularization?Biomolecules · 2021Review
- Oral administration of alanyl-glutamine and glutamine improve random pattern dorsal skin flap survival in rats.Iranian journal of basic medical sciences · 2018Article
- A Comparison of Three Methods for the Analysis of Skin Flap Viability: Reliability and Validity.Advances in wound care · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe aim of this study is to determine the effects of progesterone treatment on the survival of random skin flaps. MATERIALS AND
methodsMcFarlane flaps were established and 40 male rats were randomly assigned to the progesterone-treated as the test group or normal saline-treated as the control group. Progesterone or normal saline (10 mg/kg) was administered intraperitoneally once daily. On postoperative day 2, malondialdehyde (MDA) and superoxide dismutase (SOD) were detected using test kits. Flap survival rates were evaluated with transparent graph paper under direct visualization, the levels of inflammation were examined by haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining, and the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) was immunohistochemically evaluated on day 7.
resultsCompared to that in the control group, the mean survival area was significantly larger in the progesterone group. SOD activity was increased significantly, but the MDA levels in the test group were decreased. H&E-stained slices revealed that inflammation was inhibited in the test group. VEGF expression markedly increased in the progesterone group.
conclusionThis study showed that progesterone administered intraperitoneally significantly improved random skin flap survival in rats.
Indexed as
Identifiers
27917271PMC5126216What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.