Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27917150›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology2016

Nurse-Led Intervention to Improve Knowledge of Medications in Survivors of Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.

Muideen T Olaiya, Dominique A Cadilhac, Joosup Kim, David Ung, Mark R Nelson, Velandai K Srikanth, Christopher F Bladin, Richard P Gerraty, Sharyn M Fitzgerald, Thanh G Phan and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Information provision for stroke survivors and their carers.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Quality of life after stroke: a longitudinal analysis of a cluster randomized trial.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2022
    Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Muideen T OlaiyaStroke and Ageing Research Centre, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University , Clayton, VIC , Australia.
Dominique A CadilhacStroke and Ageing Research Centre, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia; Stroke Division, The Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia.
Joosup KimStroke and Ageing Research Centre, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia; Stroke Division, The Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia.
David UngStroke and Ageing Research Centre, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University , Clayton, VIC , Australia.
Mark R NelsonMenzies Institute for Medical Research, Hobart, TAS, Australia; Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Velandai K SrikanthStroke and Ageing Research Centre, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia; Menzies Institute for Medical Research, Hobart, TAS, Australia.
Christopher F BladinDepartment of Neurosciences, Box Hill Hospital , Box Hill, VIC , Australia.
Richard P GerratyDepartment of Medicine, Epworth Healthcare , Richmond, VIC , Australia.
Sharyn M FitzgeraldDepartment of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University , Melbourne, VIC , Australia.
Thanh G PhanStroke and Ageing Research Centre, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University , Clayton, VIC , Australia.
Judith FrayneDepartment of Neurology, Alfred Hospital , Prahan, VIC , Australia.
Amanda G ThriftStroke and Ageing Research Centre, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University , Clayton, VIC , Australia.
Monash University · AUBox Hill Hospital · AUEpworth Hospital · AUFlorey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health · AUMenzies Institute for Medical ResearchThe Alfred Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionLimited evidence exists on effective interventions to improve knowledge of preventive medications in patients with chronic diseases, such as stroke. We investigated the effectiveness of a nurse-led intervention, where a component was to improve knowledge of prevention medications, in patients with stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA).

methodsProspective sub-study of the Shared Team Approach between Nurses and Doctors for Improved Risk Factor Management, a randomized controlled trial of risk factor management. We recruited patients aged ≥18 years and hospitalized for stroke/TIA. The intervention comprised an individualized management program, involving nurse-led education, and management plan with medical specialist oversight. The outcome, participants' knowledge of secondary prevention medications at 12 months, was assessed using questionnaires. A score of ≥5 was considered as good knowledge. Effectiveness of the intervention on knowledge of medications was determined using logistic regression.

resultsBetween May 2014 and January 2015, 142 consecutive participants from the main trial were included in this sub-study, 64 to usual care and 78 to the intervention (median age 68.9 years, 68% males, and 79% ischemic stroke). In multivariable analyses, we found no significant difference between intervention groups in knowledge of medications. Factors independently associated with good knowledge (score ≥5) at 12 months included higher socioeconomic position (OR 4.79, 95% CI 1.76, 13.07), greater functional ability (OR 1.69, 95% CI 1.17, 2.45), being married/living with a partner (OR 3.12, 95% CI 1.10, 8.87), and using instructions on pill bottle/package as an administration aid (OR 4.82, 95% CI 1.76, 13.22). Being aged ≥65 years was associated with poorer knowledge of medications (OR 0.24, 95% CI 0.08, 0.71), while knowledge was worse among those taking three medications (OR 0.15, 95% CI 0.03, 0.66) or ≥4 medications (OR 0.09, 95% CI 0.02, 0.44), when compared to participants taking fewer (≤2) prevention medications.

conclusionThere was no evidence that the nurse-led intervention was effective for improving knowledge of secondary prevention medications in patients with stroke/TIA at 12 months. However, older patients and those taking more medications should be particularly targeted for more intensive education.

trial registrationAustralian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12688000166370).

Indexed as

nursing interventionpatient medication knowledgerandomized controlled trialsecondary preventionstroke

Identifiers

PMID27917150
PMCPMC5114293
OpenAlexW2550702028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.