Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27917107›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in neuroscience2016

The Berlin Brain-Computer Interface: Progress Beyond Communication and Control.

Benjamin Blankertz, Laura Acqualagna, Sven Dähne, Stefan Haufe, Matthias Schultze-Kraft, Irene Sturm, Marija Ušćumlic, Markus A Wenzel, Gabriel Curio, Klaus-Robert Müller

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. [Neurovascular coupling analysis of working memory based on electroencephalography and functional near-infrared spectroscopy].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Benjamin BlankertzNeurotechnology Group, Technische Universität BerlinBerlin, Germany; Bernstein Focus: NeurotechnologyBerlin, Germany.
Laura AcqualagnaNeurotechnology Group, Technische Universität Berlin Berlin, Germany.
Sven DähneMachine Learning Group, Technische Universität Berlin Berlin, Germany.
Stefan HaufeBernstein Focus: NeurotechnologyBerlin, Germany; Machine Learning Group, Technische Universität BerlinBerlin, Germany.
Matthias Schultze-KraftNeurotechnology Group, Technische Universität BerlinBerlin, Germany; Bernstein Focus: NeurotechnologyBerlin, Germany.
Irene SturmNeurotechnology Group, Technische Universität Berlin Berlin, Germany.
Marija UšćumlicNeurotechnology Group, Technische Universität Berlin Berlin, Germany.
Markus A WenzelNeurotechnology Group, Technische Universität Berlin Berlin, Germany.
Gabriel CurioBernstein Focus: NeurotechnologyBerlin, Germany; Neurophysics Group, Department of Neurology, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Charité - University Medicine BerlinBerlin, Germany.
Klaus-Robert MüllerBernstein Focus: NeurotechnologyBerlin, Germany; Machine Learning Group, Technische Universität BerlinBerlin, Germany; Department of Brain and Cognitive Engineering, Korea UniversitySeoul, South Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The combined effect of fundamental results about neurocognitive processes and advancements in decoding mental states from ongoing brain signals has brought forth a whole range of potential neurotechnological applications. In this article, we review our developments in this area and put them into perspective. These examples cover a wide range of maturity levels with respect to their applicability. While we assume we are still a long way away from integrating Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) technology in general interaction with computers, or from implementing neurotechnological measures in safety-critical workplaces, results have already now been obtained involving a BCI as research tool. In this article, we discuss the reasons why, in some of the prospective application domains, considerable effort is still required to make the systems ready to deal with the full complexity of the real world.

Indexed as

Brain-Computer Interfacing (BCI)cognitive neurosciencecovert user stateselectroencephalography (EEG)implicit informationmachine learningmental workloadvideo quality

Identifiers

PMID27917107
PMCPMC5116473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.