Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27916892›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2016

Molecular Mechanisms of p53 Deregulation in Cancer: An Overview in Multiple Myeloma.

Ana B Herrero, Elizabeta A Rojas, Irena Misiewicz-Krzeminska, Patryk Krzeminski, Norma C Gutiérrez

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 93 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Karyotype evolution of multiple myeloma.Journal of clinical and experimental hematopathology : JCEH · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Refining High-Risk Multiple Myeloma: Advancements in Genomic, Clinical, and Prognostic Criteria.Mediterranean journal of hematology and infectious diseases · 2025
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ana B HerreroCancer Research Center-IBMCC (USAL-CSIC), 37007 Salamanca, Spain. anah@usal.es.
Elizabeta A RojasCancer Research Center-IBMCC (USAL-CSIC), 37007 Salamanca, Spain. elirr@usal.es.
Irena Misiewicz-KrzeminskaCancer Research Center-IBMCC (USAL-CSIC), 37007 Salamanca, Spain. irenamk@usal.es.
Patryk KrzeminskiCancer Research Center-IBMCC (USAL-CSIC), 37007 Salamanca, Spain. patrykk@usal.es.
Norma C GutiérrezCancer Research Center-IBMCC (USAL-CSIC), 37007 Salamanca, Spain. normagu@usal.es.
Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Salamanca · ESUniversidad de Salamanca · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The p53 pathway is inactivated in the majority of human cancers. Although this perturbation frequently occurs through the mutation or deletion of p53 itself, there are other mechanisms that can attenuate the pathway and contribute to tumorigenesis. For example, overexpression of important p53 negative regulators, such as murine double minute 2 (MDM2) or murine double minute 4 (MDM4), epigenetic deregulation, or even alterations in

Indexed as

AnimalsEpigenesis, GeneticHumansMultiple MyelomaMutationProto-Oncogene Proteins c-mdm2Tumor Suppressor Protein p53Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-mdm2Tumor Suppressor Protein p53cancerepigeneticsmiRNAsmyelomap53p53-based therapyTP53 methylationTP53 mutationsTP53 splicing

Identifiers

PMID27916892
PMCPMC5187803
OpenAlexW2557390939

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.