Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27915972›Full record

ReviewCritical reviews in oncogenesis2016

Resistance to Cell Death and Its Modulation in Cancer Stem Cells.

Ahmad R Safa

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Critical reviews in oncogenesis, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 81 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
81citing papers in PubMed
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

81 citing papers in PubMed, 145 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Liposomal Delivery of Cell Impermeable Phototoxic Ru(II) Complexes.Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Targeted Cancer Stem Cell Therapeutics: An Update.Current topics in medicinal chemistry · 2025
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Cells · 2023
    Article
  20. Article

21 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ahmad R SafaIndiana University Simon Cancer Center and Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.
Indiana University Health · US

Funding

Role of Proteinase-3 in Apoptosis and Drug ResistanceR01CA101743 · NCI · INDIANA UNIV-PURDUE UNIV AT INDIANAPOLIS · PI SAFA, AHMAD R · 2003 to 2007
$1.5M
DRUG RESISTANCE DUE TO LOSS OF BETA2 MICROGLOBULINR01CA080734 · NCI · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI SAFA, AHMAD R · 1999 to 2005
$1.4M
The Role of MEF1 in Multidrug ResistanceR01CA090878 · NCI · INDIANA UNIV-PURDUE UNIV AT INDIANAPOLIS · PI SAFA, AHMAD R · 2001 to 2004
$1.1M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA080734NCI NIH HHS R01 CA090878NCI NIH HHS R01 CA101743
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accumulating evidence has demonstrated that human cancers arise from various tissues of origin that initiate from cancer stem cells (CSCs) or cancer-initiating cells. The extrinsic and intrinsic apoptotic pathways are dysregulated in CSCs, and these cells play crucial roles in tumor initiation, progression, cell death resistance, chemo- and radiotherapy resistance, and tumor recurrence. Understanding CSC-specific signaling proteins and pathways is necessary to identify specific therapeutic targets that may lead to the development of more efficient therapies selectively targeting CSCs. Several signaling pathways-including the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/Akt/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), maternal embryonic leucine zipper kinase (MELK), NOTCH1, and Wnt/Β-catenin&and expression of the CSC markers CD133, CD24, CD44, Oct4, Sox2, Nanog, and ALDH1A1 maintain CSC properties. Studying such pathways may help to understand CSC biology and lead to the development of potential therapeutic interventions to render CSCs more sensitive to cell death triggered by chemotherapy and radiation therapy. Moreover, recent demonstrations of dedifferentiation of differentiated cancer cells into CSC-like cells have created significant complexity in the CSCs hypothesis. Therefore, any successful therapeutic agent or combination of drugs for cancer therapy must eliminate not only CSCs but differentiated cancer cells and the entire bulk of tumor cells. This review article expands on the CSC hypothesis and paradigm with respect to major signaling pathways and effectors that regulate CSC apoptosis resistance. Moreover, selective CSC apoptotic modulators and their therapeutic potential for making tumors more responsive to therapy are discussed. The use of novel therapies, including small-molecule inhibitors of specific proteins in signaling pathways that regulate stemness, proliferation and migration of CSCs, immunotherapy, and noncoding microRNAs may provide better means of treating CSCs.

Indexed as

ApoptosisSignal TransductionAnimalsHumansNeoplasmsNeoplastic Stem Cells

Identifiers

PMID27915972
PMCPMC5356509
OpenAlexW2509858589

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.