ArticleGastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association2017
Interobserver agreement in detection of "white globe appearance" and the ability of educational lectures to improve the diagnosis of gastric lesions.
Article in Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- White Globe Appearance Is an Endoscopic Predictor of Metachronous Multiple Gastric Cancers.DEN open · 2027Article
- Endoscopic and histopathological phenotypes of early gastric neoplasia: toward an integrative host-response framework.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Screening for and surveillance of premalignant conditions of the stomach.Best practice & research. Clinical gastroenterology · 2025Review
- Correlation between White Globe Appearance and Clinicopathologic Characteristics in Early Gastric Cancer.Gut and liver · 2025Article
- Application of Endoscopic Ultrasound Combined with Multislice Spiral CT in Diagnosis and Treatment of Patients with Gastrointestinal Eminence Lesions.Disease markers · 2022Article
- Image-Enhanced Endoscopy and Its Corresponding Histopathology in the Stomach.Gut and liver · 2021Review
- White globe appearance is an endoscopic predictive factor for synchronous multiple gastric cancer.Annals of gastroenterology · 2021Article
- The white substance may be a potential endoscopic marker for flat esophageal mucosal neoplastic lesions: A new endoscopic observation.Medicine · 2018Article
- Two Cases of White Globe Appearance in Autoimmune Atrophic Gastritis.Case reports in gastrointestinal medicine · 2018Article
- Two cases of white globe appearance in non-cancerous stomach.Ecancermedicalscience · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWhite globe appearance (WGA) refers to a small white lesion of globular shape underneath cancerous gastric epithelium that can be clearly visualized by magnifying endoscopy with narrowband imaging (M-NBI). WGA has been reported to be a novel endoscopic marker that is highly specific in differentiating early gastric cancer (GC) from low-grade adenoma, and has a significantly higher prevalence in early GCs than in noncancerous lesions. However, interobserver agreement in detecting WGA and whether training intervention can improve diagnostic accuracy are unknown.
methodsTwenty sets of M-NBI images were examined by 16 endoscopists. The endoscopists attended a lecture about WGA, and examined the images again after the lecture. Interobserver agreement in detecting WGA in the second examination and increases in the proportion of correct diagnoses and the degree of confidence of diagnoses of cancerous lesions were evaluated.
resultsThe kappa value for interobserver agreement in detecting WGA in the second examination was 0.735. The proportion of correct diagnoses was significantly higher in the second examination compared with the first examination when WGA was present (95.5% vs 55.4%; P < 0.001), but not when WGA was absent (61.6% vs 52.7%; P = 0.190). The proportion of correct diagnoses with a high degree of confidence was significantly higher in the second examination, both with WGA (91.1% vs 29.5%; P < 0.001) and without WGA (36.6% vs 20.5%; P = 0.031).
conclusionsThe detection of WGA by endoscopists was highly reproducible. A brief educational lecture about WGA increased the proportion of correct diagnoses and the degree of confidence of diagnoses of GC with WGA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
27915451What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.