ArticleNeurology and therapy2017
High-Risk PML Patients Switching from Natalizumab to Alemtuzumab: an Observational Study.
Article in Neurology and therapy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Product review on MAbs (alemtuzumab and ocrelizumab) for the treatment of multiple sclerosis.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2021Article
- Effect of switching from natalizumab to moderate- vs high-efficacy DMT in clinical practice.Neurology. Clinical practice · 2020Article
- Disease activity outcomes with different washout periods after switching from natalizumab to an alternative disease-modifying therapy.Journal of neurology · 2020Article
- Monoclonal Antibody Therapies for Multiple Sclerosis and Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder.Journal of clinical neurology (Seoul, Korea) · 2020Review
- The use of alemtuzumab in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: the Gulf perspective.Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders · 2020Review
- Post-natalizumab disease reactivation in multiple sclerosis: systematic review and meta-analysis.Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders · 2019Article
- Efficacy and safety of alemtuzumab versus fingolimod in RRMS after natalizumab cessation.Journal of neurology · 2019Article
- The sequence of disease-modifying therapies in relapsing multiple sclerosis: safety and immunologic considerations.Journal of neurology · 2017Review
- Alemtuzumab in the long-term treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: an update on the clinical trial evidence and data from the real world.Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders · 2017Article
- Natalizumab in Multiple Sclerosis: Long-Term Management.International journal of molecular sciences · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe choice of therapy in patients withdrawing from natalizumab treatment is still an open question and neurologists need strategies to manage this group of patients. The aim of this study is to evaluate if alemtuzumab is able to control the disease when used in patient who have stopped natalizumab.
methods16 patients stopped natalizumab treatment after a median number of 20 infusions (range 12-114); all the patients were responders to natalizumab (neither clinical nor radiological activity during natalizumab therapy) and the reason for stopping was the risk of PML for all of them. Patients were switched to alemtuzumab after a median wash-out period of 70 days (range 41-99 days); patients underwent brain MRI every three months during natalizumab treatment and then just before starting alemtuzumab in order to exclude signs suggestive of PML; then, contrast-enhanced brain MRI was planned 6 and 12 months after alemtuzumab infusion.
resultsAt present, 8 out of 16 patients have a follow-up >6 months and 2 out of 8 reached 1-year follow-up; 5 have a follow-up of 3-6 months and 3 have a follow-up <3 months. Brain MRI at 6 months after alemtuzumab is available for 8 out of 16 patients and in all of them, neither signs of disease activity nor new lesions are present; in 2 out of 8 patients, brain MRI at 12 months is also available, showing no sign of disease activity. Clinical evaluation performed at 6 and at 12 months (when available) showed stability, in particular neither relapses nor increase in EDSS were observed.
conclusionsAlemtuzumab was able to control the disease course in patients who stopped natalizumab; of course, as this is a single-centre study and the number of patients is small, these findings are very preliminary and need further confirmation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.