ReviewUrolithiasis2017
Timelines of the "free-particle" and "fixed-particle" models of stone-formation: theoretical and experimental investigations.
Review in Urolithiasis, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of short-term atorvastatin use in patients with calcium stones: A randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial.Investigative and clinical urology · 2019Trial
- Visual assessment of Randall's plaque using traxer grading and its correlations with demographic characteristics, metabolic parameters and stone analysis.World journal of urology · 2026Article
- Animal models for calcium oxalate kidney stone research.Zoological research · 2026Review
- Intercalated bacterial biofilms are intrinsic internal components of calcium-based kidney stones.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- The Application of Nanomaterials in Kidney Stone Disease: Emerging Strategies for Early Diagnosis, Targeted Therapy, and Prevention.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Linking basic principles of solution chemistry to kidney stone formation timelines.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- An analysis of the burden of urolithiasis: differences between the global, China, India and the United States, with projections through 2050.Urolithiasis · 2025Article
- Correlation analysis between urinary crystals and upper urinary calculi.Asian journal of urology · 2024Article
- Tumour lysis syndrome.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2024Review
- Theranostic roles of machine learning in clinical management of kidney stone disease.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023Review
- Assessing kidney stone composition using smartphone microscopy and deep neural networks.BJUI compass · 2022Article
- Editorial: Immunity and Inflammatory Response in Kidney Stone Disease.Frontiers in immunology · 2021Article
- The surgeon's role on chemical investigations of the composition of urinary stones.Urolithiasis · 2020Article
- Prevention of Calcium Nephrolithiasis: The Influence of Diuresis on Calcium Oxalate Crystallization in Urine.Advances in preventive medicine · 2019Review
- No Reported Renal Stones with Intravenous Vitamin C Administration: A Prospective Case Series Study.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018Article
- Papillary Ductal Plugging is a Mechanism for Early Stone Retention in Brushite Stone Disease.The Journal of urology · 2018Article
- Do "inhibitors of crystallisation" play any role in the prevention of kidney stones? A critique.Urolithiasis · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Two major theories on renal stone formation will be reviewed, the "free-particle" and "fixed-particle" mechanisms. These theories combine data on intrinsic factors (inborn metabolic errors), extrinsic factors (diet), renal cell responses and the physico-chemistry and biochemistry of urine into mechanisms of stone formation. This paper describes the specific role of time in both mechanisms. The timeline of crystal- and stone formation was deducted from literature data and was measured for two stones using radioisotope decay analysis. The stones of similar size and composition showed, respectively, a timeline of a few years and a development that took decades. In combination with data on stone architecture and patient characteristics these timelines are explained using the free-particle and fixed-particle mechanisms. Consideration of the timeline of stone formation has clinical implications. We conclude that the fixed-particle mechanism can be a slow process where decades pass between the first formation of a precipitate in the renal interstitium and the clinical presentation of the stone. Added to the fact that the mechanism of this initial precipitation is still ill defined, the conditions that started fixed-particle stone formation in an individual patient can be obscure. Blood and urine analysis in such patients does not necessarily reveal the individual's risk for recurrence as lifestyle may have changed over time. This is in fact what defines the so-called idiopathic stoneformers. For these patients, prevention of outgrowth of previously formed precipitates, papillary plaques, may be more relevant than prevention of new plaque formation. In contrast, a patient who has formed a stone in a relatively short time through the free-particle mechanism is more likely to show abnormal values in blood and urine that explain the starting event of stone formation. In these patients, measurement of such values provides useful information to guide preventive measures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.