Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27915388›Full record

ArticleExtremophiles : life under extreme conditions2017

Microbial diversity in degraded and non-degraded petroleum samples and comparison across oil reservoirs at local and global scales.

Isabel Natalia Sierra-Garcia, Bruna M Dellagnezze, Viviane P Santos, Michel R Chaves B, Ramsés Capilla, Eugenio V Santos Neto, Neil Gray, Valeria M Oliveira

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Extremophiles : life under extreme conditions, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Complete Genome Sequence ofMicrobiology resource announcements · 2018
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Isabel Natalia Sierra-GarciaMicrobial Resources Division, Research Center for Chemistry, Biology and Agriculture (CPQBA), University of Campinas, UNICAMP, Campinas, CEP 13148-218, Brazil. inatalia.sierra@gmail.com.
Bruna M DellagnezzeMicrobial Resources Division, Research Center for Chemistry, Biology and Agriculture (CPQBA), University of Campinas, UNICAMP, Campinas, CEP 13148-218, Brazil.
Viviane P SantosMicrobial Resources Division, Research Center for Chemistry, Biology and Agriculture (CPQBA), University of Campinas, UNICAMP, Campinas, CEP 13148-218, Brazil.
Michel R Chaves BInstitute of Chemistry, University of Campinas, Campinas, CEP13083-970, Brazil.
Ramsés CapillaPETROBRAS/R&D Center, Rio de Janeiro, CEP 21949-900, Brazil.
Eugenio V Santos NetoPETROBRAS/R&D Center, Rio de Janeiro, CEP 21949-900, Brazil.
Neil GraySchool of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 7RU, UK.
Valeria M OliveiraMicrobial Resources Division, Research Center for Chemistry, Biology and Agriculture (CPQBA), University of Campinas, UNICAMP, Campinas, CEP 13148-218, Brazil.
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) · BRPetrobras (Brazil) · BRNewcastle University · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microorganisms have shown their ability to colonize extreme environments including deep subsurface petroleum reservoirs. Physicochemical parameters may vary greatly among petroleum reservoirs worldwide and so do the microbial communities inhabiting these different environments. The present work aimed at the characterization of the microbiota in biodegraded and non-degraded petroleum samples from three Brazilian reservoirs and the comparison of microbial community diversity across oil reservoirs at local and global scales using 16S rRNA clone libraries. The analysis of 620 16S rRNA bacterial and archaeal sequences obtained from Brazilian oil samples revealed 42 bacterial OTUs and 21 archaeal OTUs. The bacterial community from the degraded oil was more diverse than the non-degraded samples. Non-degraded oil samples were overwhelmingly dominated by gammaproteobacterial sequences with a predominance of the genera Marinobacter and Marinobacterium. Comparisons of microbial diversity among oil reservoirs worldwide suggested an apparent correlation of prokaryotic communities with reservoir temperature and depth and no influence of geographic distance among reservoirs. The detailed analysis of the phylogenetic diversity across reservoirs allowed us to define a core microbiome encompassing three bacterial classes (Gammaproteobacteria, Clostridia, and Bacteroidia) and one archaeal class (Methanomicrobia) ubiquitous in petroleum reservoirs and presumably owning the abilities to sustain life in these environments.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaArchaeaMarinobacterOil and Gas FieldsPetroleumPhylogenyRNA, Ribosomal, 16SPetroleumRNA, Ribosomal, 16SDegradationMicrobial diversityOilPetroleum reservoirs

Identifiers

PMID27915388
OpenAlexW2557472556

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.