Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27915387›Full record

ReviewCell biology and toxicology2017

The translational potential of human induced pluripotent stem cells for clinical neurology : The translational potential of hiPSCs in neurology.

Helen Devine, Rickie Patani

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cell biology and toxicology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Comparison of Acute Effects of Neurotoxic Compounds on Network Activity in Human and Rodent Neural Cultures.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Helen DevineDepartment of Molecular Neuroscience, UCL Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London, WC1N3BG, UK.
Rickie PataniDepartment of Molecular Neuroscience, UCL Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London, WC1N3BG, UK. rickie.patani@ucl.ac.uk.
National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/N020820/1Wellcome Trust 101149/Z/13/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The induced pluripotent state represents a decade-old Nobel prize-winning discovery. Human-induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) are generated by the nuclear reprogramming of any somatic cell using a variety of established but evolving methods. This approach offers medical science unparalleled experimental opportunity to model an individual patient's disease "in a dish." HiPSCs permit developmentally rationalized directed differentiation into any cell type, which express donor cell mutation(s) at pathophysiological levels and thus hold considerable potential for disease modeling, drug discovery, and potentially cell-based therapies. This review will focus on the translational potential of hiPSCs in clinical neurology and the importance of integrating this approach with complementary model systems to increase the translational yield of preclinical testing for the benefit of patients. This strategy is particularly important given the expected increase in prevalence of neurodegenerative disease, which poses a major burden to global health over the coming decades.

Indexed as

NeurologyTranslational Research, BiomedicalCell DifferentiationDrug DiscoveryGenetic VariationHumansInduced Pluripotent Stem CellsCellular therapyDisease modelingDrug discoveryHuman induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs)NeurologyTranslational medicine

Identifiers

PMID27915387
PMCPMC5325844
OpenAlexW2558687212

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.