ArticleNucleic acids research2016
Codon usage is less optimized in eukaryotic gene segments encoding intrinsically disordered regions than in those encoding structural domains.
Article in Nucleic acids research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mapping the inter- and intra-genic codon-usage landscape inNAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Quantifying shifts in natural selection on codon usage between protein regions: a population genetics approach.BMC genomics · 2022Article
- Advances in COVID-19 mRNA vaccine development.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2022Review
- Modifications of mRNA vaccine structural elements for improving mRNA stability and translation efficiency.Molecular & cellular toxicology · 2022Review
- mRNA vaccine: a potential therapeutic strategy.Molecular cancer · 2021Review
- Codon selection reduces GC content bias in nucleic acids encoding for intrinsically disordered proteins.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2020Article
- Robustness by intrinsically disordered C-termini and translational readthrough.Nucleic acids research · 2018Article
- The Evolutionary Basis of Translational Accuracy in Plants.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Codon usage tends to be optimized in highly expressed genes. A plausible explanation for this phenomenon is that translational accuracy is increased in highly expressed genes with infrequent use of rare codons. Besides structural domains (SDs), eukaryotic proteins generally have intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs) that by themselves do not assume unique three-dimensional structures. As IDRs are free from structural constraint, they can probably accommodate more translational errors than SDs can. Thus, codon usage in IDRs is likely to be less optimized than that in SDs. Codon usage in all the genes of seven eukaryotes was examined in terms of both tRNA adaptation index and codon adaptation index. Different amino acid compositions in different protein regions were taken into account in calculating expected adaptation indices, to which observed indices were compared. Codon usage is less optimized in gene regions encoding IDRs than in those corresponding to SDs. The finding does not depend on whether IDRs are located at the N-terminus, in the middle, or at the C-terminus of proteins. Furthermore, the observation remains unchanged in two different algorithms used to predict IDRs in proteins. The result is consistent with the idea that IDRs tolerate more translational errors than SDs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.