Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27915004›Full record

ArticleCancer epidemiology2016

Economic analysis of the Nairobi Cancer Registry: Implications for expanding and enhancing cancer registration in Kenya.

Anne Korir, Robai Gakunga, Sujha Subramanian, Nathan Okerosi, Gladys Chesumbai, Patrick Edwards, Florence Tangka, Rachael Joseph, Nathan Buziba, Victor Rono and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer epidemiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Anne KorirNairobi Cancer Registry, Kenya Medical Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya. Electronic address: akorir@kemri.org.
Robai GakungaIndependent Researcher, Nairobi, Kenya.
Sujha SubramanianRTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
Nathan OkerosiNairobi Cancer Registry, Kenya Medical Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya.
Gladys ChesumbaiEldoret Cancer Registry, Moi University, Eldoret, Kenya.
Patrick EdwardsRTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
Florence TangkaCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Rachael JosephUnited States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Nairobi, Kenya.
Nathan BuzibaEldoret Cancer Registry, Moi University, Eldoret, Kenya.
Victor RonoNairobi Cancer Registry, Kenya Medical Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya.
Donald Maxwell ParkinHonorary Senior Research Fellow, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Richard Doll Building, Old Road Campus, Roosevelt Drive, Oxford, OX3 7LF, United Kingdom.
Mona SaraiyaCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCancer registration is an important activity for informing cancer control activities. Cancer registries in Sub-Saharan Africa have limited resources to effectively operate because of competing priorities. To date, there has not been an assessment of the resources and funding needed to perform all the activities essential for cancer registration in Kenya. Evidence will help registries to quantify and advocate for the funds needed to sustain, enhance, and expand high quality cancer registration in Kenya.

methodsIn this study, we used the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC's) International Registry Costing Tool (IntRegCosting Tool) to evaluate the funding, cost, and labor resources used to perform the cancer registry operations in Nairobi County for two annual periods between July 2012 and June 2014.

resultsFunding from grants, research studies, and international organizations provided 70% of the registry operations' cost. For both time periods, the most-costly registry activities were related to administration, management, and training, along with data acquisition activities such as data abstraction, entry, and validation. Even among these core registry activities, however, substantial variations existed.

conclusionsStable funding for cancer registry operations is necessary to sustain core registry activities in other to deliver high-quality data, which in turn is necessary to foster evidence-based policies to improve cancer outcomes. As stakeholders look into expanding the Nairobi Cancer Registry into a national program, the cost data provided in this study will help justify the funding required for sustaining and expanding registry activities.

Indexed as

Costs and Cost AnalysisRegistriesAdultAgedFemaleHealth ResourcesHumansKenyaMaleMiddle AgedNeeds AssessmentNeoplasmsActivity-based costCancer registryEconomic evaluationKenya

Identifiers

PMID27915004
PMCPMC5840871

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.