Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27914982›Full record

ArticleBiomaterials2017

Nanotopography controls cell cycle changes involved with skeletal stem cell self-renewal and multipotency.

Louisa C Y Lee, Nikolaj Gadegaard, María C de Andrés, Lesley-Anne Turner, Karl V Burgess, Stephen J Yarwood, Julia Wells, Manuel Salmeron-Sanchez, Dominic Meek, Richard O C Oreffo and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomaterials, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Membrane curvature underlies actin reorganization in response to nanoscale surface topography.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Designing stem cell niches for differentiation and self-renewal.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2018
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Louisa C Y LeeCentre for Cell Engineering, Institute of Molecular, Cell and Systems Biology, College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences, Joseph Black Building, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8QQ, UK.
Nikolaj GadegaardDivision of Biomedical Engineering, School of Engineering, Rankine Building, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8LT, UK.
María C de AndrésBone and Joint Research Group, Centre for Human Development, Stem Cells and Regeneration, Institute of Developmental Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK.
Lesley-Anne TurnerCentre for Cell Engineering, Institute of Molecular, Cell and Systems Biology, College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences, Joseph Black Building, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8QQ, UK.
Karl V BurgessGlasgow Polyomics Facility, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Wolfson Wohl Cancer Research Centre, Garsube Campus, Bearsden, G61 1QH, UK.
Stephen J YarwoodInstitute of Biological Chemistry, Biophysics and Bioengineering, William Perkin Building, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, EH14 4AS, UK.
Julia WellsBone and Joint Research Group, Centre for Human Development, Stem Cells and Regeneration, Institute of Developmental Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK.
Manuel Salmeron-SanchezDivision of Biomedical Engineering, School of Engineering, Rankine Building, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8LT, UK.
Dominic MeekDepartment of Orthopaedics, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, G51 4TF, UK.
Richard O C OreffoBone and Joint Research Group, Centre for Human Development, Stem Cells and Regeneration, Institute of Developmental Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK.
Matthew J DalbyCentre for Cell Engineering, Institute of Molecular, Cell and Systems Biology, College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences, Joseph Black Building, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8QQ, UK. Electronic address: matthew.dalby@glasgow.ac.uk.
University of Glasgow · GBUniversity of Southampton · GBHeriot-Watt University · GBQueen Elizabeth University Hospital · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/D015324/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/K011235/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/L021072/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/L023814/1British Heart Foundation FS/17/12/32703British Heart Foundation PG/10/26/28303British Heart Foundation PG/15/15/31316
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In culture isolated bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (more precisely termed skeletal stem cells, SSCs) spontaneously differentiate into fibroblasts, preventing the growth of large numbers of multipotent SSCs for use in regenerative medicine. However, the mechanisms that regulate the expansion of SSCs, while maintaining multipotency and preventing fibroblastic differentiation are poorly understood. Major hurdles to understanding how the maintenance of SSCs is regulated are (a) SSCs isolated from bone marrow are heterogeneous populations with different proliferative characteristics and (b) a lack of tools to investigate SSC number expansion and multipotency. Here, a nanotopographical surface is used as a tool that permits SSC proliferation while maintaining multipotency. It is demonstrated that retention of SSC phenotype in culture requires adjustments to the cell cycle that are linked to changes in the activation of the mitogen activated protein kinases. This demonstrates that biomaterials can offer cross-SSC culture tools and that the biological processes that determine whether SSCs retain multipotency or differentiate into fibroblasts are subtle, in terms of biochemical control, but are profound in terms of determining cell fate.

Indexed as

Biocompatible MaterialsCell CycleCell Cycle ProteinsCell DifferentiationCells, CulturedCell Self RenewalHumansMesenchymal Stem CellsNanoparticlesOsteoblastsSurface PropertiesBiocompatible MaterialsCell Cycle ProteinsCell cycleMesenchymal stem cellsNanotopographySkeletal stem cells

Identifiers

PMID27914982
PMCPMC5226065
OpenAlexW2551222789

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.