Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27914478›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2016

Germline mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 in epithelial ovarian cancer patients in Brazil.

Simone Maistro, Natalia Teixeira, Giselly Encinas, Maria Lucia Hirata Katayama, Vivian Dionisio Tavares Niewiadonski, Larissa Garcia Cabral, Roberto Marques Ribeiro, Nelson Gaburo Junior, Ana Carolina Ribeiro Chaves de Gouvêa, Dirce Maria Carraro and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Genomic ancestry and cancer among Latin Americans.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Simone MaistroDepartamento de Radiologia e Oncologia, Centro de Investigação Translacional em Oncologia, Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Natalia TeixeiraFaculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Giselly EncinasDepartamento de Radiologia e Oncologia, Centro de Investigação Translacional em Oncologia, Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Maria Lucia Hirata KatayamaDepartamento de Radiologia e Oncologia, Centro de Investigação Translacional em Oncologia, Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Vivian Dionisio Tavares NiewiadonskiDepartamento de Doenças Infecciosas, Instituto de Medicina Tropical, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Larissa Garcia CabralDepartamento de Radiologia e Oncologia, Centro de Investigação Translacional em Oncologia, Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Roberto Marques RibeiroDepartamento de Doenças Infecciosas, Instituto de Medicina Tropical, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Nelson Gaburo JuniorDepartamento de Diagnóstico Molecular, DASA, São Paulo, Brazil.
Ana Carolina Ribeiro Chaves de GouvêaDivisão de Oncologia Clínica, Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Dirce Maria CarraroInternational Reasearch Center, A.C.Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Ester Cerdeira SabinoDepartamento de Doenças Infecciosas, Instituto de Medicina Tropical, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Maria Del Pilar Estevez DizDivisão de Oncologia Clínica, Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Roger ChammasDepartamento de Radiologia e Oncologia, Centro de Investigação Translacional em Oncologia, Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Geertruida Hendrika de BockDepartment of Epidemiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Maria Aparecida Azevedo Koike FolgueiraDepartamento de Radiologia e Oncologia, Centro de Investigação Translacional em Oncologia, Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil. maria.folgueira@fm.usp.br.ORCID 0000-0002-2334-0919

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundApproximately 8-15% epithelial ovarian cancer patients are BRCA1 or BRCA2 germline mutation carriers. Brazilian inhabitants may have peculiar genetic characteristics associated with ethnic diversity, and studies focusing on the entire BRCA1/BRCA2 gene sequencing in Brazilian ovarian cancer patients are still lacking. The aim of this study was to evaluate BRCA1/2 mutations, through entire gene sequencing, in a Brazilian population of women with epithelial ovarian cancer.

methodsIn a cross sectional study performed in one reference centre for cancer treatment in São Paulo, Brazil, 100 patients diagnosed with epithelial ovarian cancer unselected for family history of breast and/or ovarian cancer were included. The complete coding sequence of BRCA1/2 genes was evaluated through Next-Generation or capillary sequencing. Large deletions were investigated through Multiplex Ligation-dependent Probe Amplification (MLPA).

resultsNineteen pathogenic mutations (BRCA1: n = 17 and BRCA2: n = 2) featuring 14 different mutations, including two large deletions in BRCA1 (exon 1-2 deleted and exon 5-7 deleted) were identified. Three mutations were detected more than once (c.3331_3334delCAAG, c.5266dupC and c.4484G > T). Two novel frameshift mutations were identified, one in BRCA1 (c.961_962delTG) and one in BRCA2 (c.1963_1963delC). BRCA1/2 mutations were seen in 35.5% of the patients with first and/or second-degree relatives with breast and/or ovarian cancer. Nineteen variants of uncertain significance (VUS) were detected (BRCA1: n = 2 and BRCA2: n = 17), including five distinct missense variants (BRCA1: c.5348 T > C; BRCA2: c.2350A > G, c.3515C > T, c.7534C > T, and c.8351G > A).

conclusionsAmong epithelial ovarian cancer patients unselected for family history of cancer, 19% were BRCA1/2 germline mutation carriers. Almost ¾ of the BRCA mutations, including two large deletions, were detected only once. Our work emphasizes the need of entire gene sequencing and MLPA screening in Brazil.

Indexed as

Germ-Line MutationAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBrazilBRCA1 ProteinBRCA2 ProteinCarcinoma, Ovarian EpithelialCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedMultiplex Polymerase Chain ReactionNeoplasms, Glandular and EpithelialOvarian NeoplasmsSequence Analysis, DNABRCA1 ProteinBRCA1 protein, humanBRCA2 ProteinBRCA2 protein, humanBRCA1BRCA2MLPANext generation sequencingOvarian cancer

Identifiers

PMID27914478
PMCPMC5135756

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.