Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27914381›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America2016

Modulation masking and glimpsing of natural and vocoded speech during single-talker modulated noise: Effect of the modulation spectrum.

Daniel Fogerty, Jiaqian Xu, Bobby E Gibbs

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Interference of Mid-level Speech and Noise Statistics Underlies Human Speech Recognition Sensitivity in Natural Environmental Noise.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. How to vocode: Using channel vocoders for cochlear-implant research.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The Intelligibility of Time-Compressed Speech Is Correlated with the Ability to Listen in Modulated Noise.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Speech Intelligibility Prediction using Spectro-Temporal Modulation Analysis.IEEE/ACM transactions on audio, speech, and language processing · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Infants' use of isolated and combined temporal cues in speech sound segregation.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Daniel FogertyDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina 29208, USA.
Jiaqian XuDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina 29208, USA.
Bobby E GibbsDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina 29208, USA.

Funding

Maximizing speech recognition under adverse listening conditionsR01DC015465 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI FOGERTY, DANIEL · 2016 to 2020
$1.6M
Maximizing Speech Recognition Under Adverse Listening ConditionsR03DC012506 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI FOGERTY, DANIEL · 2012 to 2014
$313k
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC015465NIDCD NIH HHS R03 DC012506
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Compared to notionally steady-state noise, modulated maskers provide a perceptual benefit for speech recognition, in part due to preserved speech information during the amplitude dips of the masker. However, overlap in the modulation spectrum between the target speech and the competing modulated masker may potentially result in modulation masking, and thereby offset the release from energetic masking. The current study investigated masking release provided by single-talker modulated noise. The overlap in the modulation spectra of the target speech and the modulated noise masker was varied through time compression or expansion of the competing masker. Younger normal hearing adults listened to sentences that were unprocessed or noise vocoded to primarily limit speech recognition to the preserved temporal envelope cues. For unprocessed speech, results demonstrated improved performance with masker modulation spectrum shifted up or down compared to the target modulation spectrum, except for the most extreme time expansion. For vocoded speech, significant masking release was observed with the slowest masker rate. Perceptual results combined with acoustic analyses of the preserved glimpses of the target speech suggest contributions of modulation masking and cognitive-linguistic processing as factors contributing to performance.

Indexed as

SpeechAcoustic StimulationAdultFemaleHumansMaleNoisePerceptual MaskingSpeech PerceptionYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID27914381
PMCPMC5848862

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.