Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27914058›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2017

OSPREY Predicts Resistance Mutations Using Positive and Negative Computational Protein Design.

Adegoke Ojewole, Anna Lowegard, Pablo Gainza, Stephanie M Reeve, Ivelin Georgiev, Amy C Anderson, Bruce R Donald

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Minimization-Aware RecursiveJournal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Adegoke OjewoleProgram in Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, NC, 27708, USA.
Anna LowegardProgram in Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, NC, 27708, USA.
Pablo GainzaDepartment of Computer Science, Duke University, Durham, NC, 27708, USA.
Stephanie M ReeveDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, 06269, USA.
Ivelin GeorgievDepartment of Computer Science, Duke University, Durham, NC, 27708, USA.
Amy C AndersonDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, 06269, USA.
Bruce R DonaldDepartment of Computer Science, Duke University, Durham, NC, 27708, USA. brd+mimb15@cs.duke.edu.
Duke University · USUniversity of Connecticut · US

Funding

Computational Structure-Based Protein DesignR01GM078031 · NIGMS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI DONALD, BRUCE R. · 2008 to 2021
$4.3M
Computational Biology and Bioinformatics Training ProgramT32GM071340 · NIGMS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI MAGWENE, PAUL MITAARI · 2005 to 2020
$3.3M
Antimetabolites Effective against Resistant Gram-positive BacteriaR01AI111957 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT STORRS · PI WRIGHT, DENNIS L. · 2014 to 2017
$2.2M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI111957NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM078031NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM071340
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drug resistance in protein targets is an increasingly common phenomenon that reduces the efficacy of both existing and new antibiotics. However, knowledge of future resistance mutations during pre-clinical phases of drug development would enable the design of novel antibiotics that are robust against not only known resistant mutants, but also against those that have not yet been clinically observed. Computational structure-based protein design (CSPD) is a transformative field that enables the prediction of protein sequences with desired biochemical properties such as binding affinity and specificity to a target. The use of CSPD to predict previously unseen resistance mutations represents one of the frontiers of computational protein design. In a recent study (Reeve et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 112(3):749-754, 2015), we used our OSPREY (Open Source Protein REdesign for You) suite of CSPD algorithms to prospectively predict resistance mutations that arise in the active site of the dihydrofolate reductase enzyme from methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (SaDHFR) in response to selective pressure from an experimental competitive inhibitor. We demonstrated that our top predicted candidates are indeed viable resistant mutants. Since that study, we have significantly enhanced the capabilities of OSPREY with not only improved modeling of backbone flexibility, but also efficient multi-state design, fast sparse approximations, partitioned continuous rotamers for more accurate energy bounds, and a computationally efficient representation of molecular-mechanics and quantum-mechanical energy functions. Here, using SaDHFR as an example, we present a protocol for resistance prediction using the latest version of OSPREY. Specifically, we show how to use a combination of positive and negative design to predict active site escape mutations that maintain the enzyme's catalytic function but selectively ablate binding of an inhibitor.

Indexed as

MutationSoftwareAlgorithmsAmino Acid SequenceComputational BiologyDatabases, GeneticDrug ResistanceModels, MolecularPharmacogeneticsProtein ConformationProtein EngineeringProteinsWeb BrowserProteinsAntibiotic resistance predictionComputational protein designOSPREYPositive and negative design

Identifiers

PMID27914058
PMCPMC5192561
OpenAlexW2559476455

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.