Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27913797›Full record

ArticleNeurorehabilitation and neural repair2017

Promoting Gait Recovery and Limiting Neuropathic Pain After Spinal Cord Injury.

Catherine Mercier, Meyke Roosink, Jason Bouffard, Laurent J Bouyer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurorehabilitation and neural repair, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Catherine Mercier1 Centre Interdisciplinaire de Recherche en Réadaptation et Intégration Sociale, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.
Meyke Roosink1 Centre Interdisciplinaire de Recherche en Réadaptation et Intégration Sociale, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.
Jason Bouffard1 Centre Interdisciplinaire de Recherche en Réadaptation et Intégration Sociale, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.
Laurent J Bouyer1 Centre Interdisciplinaire de Recherche en Réadaptation et Intégration Sociale, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.

Funding

CIHR MOP-125869
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most persons living with a spinal cord injury experience neuropathic pain in the months following their lesion, at the moment where they receive intensive gait rehabilitation. Based on studies using animal models, it has been proposed that central sensitization in nociceptive pathways (maladaptive plasticity) and plasticity related to motor learning (adaptive plasticity) share common neural mechanisms and compete with each other. This article aims to address the discrepancy between the growing body of basic science literature supporting this hypothesis and the general belief in rehabilitation research that pain and gait rehabilitation represent two independent problems. First, the main findings from basic research showing interactions between nociception and learning in the spinal cord will be summarized, focusing both on evidence demonstrating the impact of nociception on motor learning and of motor learning on central sensitization. Then, the generalizability of these findings in animal models to humans will be discussed. Finally, the way potential interactions between nociception and motor learning are currently taken into account in clinical research in patients with spinal cord injury will be presented. To conclude, recommendations will be proposed to better integrate findings from basic research into future clinical research in persons with spinal cord injury.

Indexed as

GaitPhysical Therapy ModalitiesAnimalsHumansNeuralgiaRecovery of FunctionSpinal Cord Injuriescentral sensitizationlocomotionmotor learningnociceptionplasticityrehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID27913797
PMCPMC5405804

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.