ReviewHematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program2016
Myeloma: management of the newly diagnosed high-risk patient.
Review in Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Improvement of revised international staging system risk stratification in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma using a high bone marrow plasma cell percentage: a real-world study in China.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Daratumumab Improves Depth of Response and Progression-free Survival in Transplant-ineligible, High-risk, Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma.The oncologist · 2022Article
- Clinical prognostic implications of EPB41L4A expression in multiple myeloma.Journal of Cancer · 2020Article
- Oprozomib in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.Blood cancer journal · 2019Article
- Navigating the treatment landscape in multiple myeloma: which combinations to use and when?Annals of hematology · 2019Review
- Bloodless tandem autologous transplant in Jehovah's Witness patients.Bone marrow transplantation · 2018Article
- ARNT/HIF-1β links high-risk 1q21 gain and microenvironmental hypoxia to drug resistance and poor prognosis in multiple myeloma.Cancer medicine · 2018Article
- [Advances in the diagnosis and treatment of multiple myeloma].Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi · 2018Article
- [Effect of 1q21 amplification on bortezomib therapeutic response and prognosis of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients].Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi · 2018Article
- Article
- Review
- Role of stem cell transplant and maintenance therapy in plasma cell disorders.Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Although there have been many definitions for high-risk (HR) myeloma, most recent consensus for classifying risk in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NMM) comes from the International Myeloma Working Group. This recently published revised International Staging System includes del(17p) or t(4;14) by fluorescence in situ hybridization, β-2 microglobulin, albumin, and lactate dehydrogenase. These elements should be captured in all NMM patients. The optimal treatments for HR myeloma have not been fully worked out; therefore, these patients should be considered for clinical trials. Outside of the trial setting for those patients who are not eligible for autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), a regimen with bortezomib, but not thalidomide, should be considered, with a duration of therapy of at least 1 year. The regimen with the best results to date is bortezomib, melphalan, and predisone. A nonthalidomide maintenance could also be considered. In patients who are eligible for ASCT, an induction regimen with bortezomib and an immunomodulatory drug should be administered for 3 to 6 months followed by 2 ASCTs. Finally, a consolidation/maintenance regimen containing at least 1 year of bortezomib should be administered followed by maintenance thereafter. For patient convenience, an oral agent that is not thalidomide could be prescribed as maintenance. Finally, in patients with HR myeloma, allogeneic SCT may be associated with reasonable outcomes, but this too will require further research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.