Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27913438›Full record

ArticleCancer research2016

Quantifying the Dynamics of Field Cancerization in Tobacco-Related Head and Neck Cancer: A Multiscale Modeling Approach.

Marc D Ryser, Walter T Lee, Neal E Ready, Kevin Z Leder, Jasmine Foo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. A computational model for the cancer field effect.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Tumor-Naïve Multimodal Profiling of Circulating Tumor DNA in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2021
    Observational
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. A morphological classification for vocal fold leukoplakia.Brazilian journal of otorhinolaryngology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Marc D RyserDuke University, Department of Mathematics, Durham, North Carolina. jyfoo@umn.edu ryser@math.duke.edu.
Walter T LeeDivision of Head and Neck Surgery & Communication Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
Neal E ReadyDivision of Medical Oncology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
Kevin Z LederDepartment of Industrial & Systems Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Jasmine FooSchool of Mathematics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota. jyfoo@umn.edu ryser@math.duke.edu.

Funding

Mathematical Models of Cancer Initiation, Progression, and Resistance to TherapyR01GM096190 · NIGMS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI DURRETT, RICK · 2010 to 2013
$1.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM096190
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High rates of local recurrence in tobacco-related head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) are commonly attributed to unresected fields of precancerous tissue. Because they are not easily detectable at the time of surgery without additional biopsies, there is a need for noninvasive methods to predict the extent and dynamics of these fields. Here, we developed a spatial stochastic model of tobacco-related HNSCC at the tissue level and calibrated the model using a Bayesian framework and population-level incidence data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registry. Probabilistic model analyses were performed to predict the field geometry at time of diagnosis, and model predictions of age-specific recurrence risks were tested against outcome data from SEER. The calibrated models predicted a strong dependence of the local field size on age at diagnosis, with a doubling of the expected field diameter between ages at diagnosis of 50 and 90 years, respectively. Similarly, the probability of harboring multiple, clonally unrelated fields at the time of diagnosis was found to increase substantially with patient age. On the basis of these findings, we hypothesized a higher recurrence risk in older than in younger patients when treated by surgery alone; we successfully tested this hypothesis using age-stratified outcome data. Further clinical studies are needed to validate the model predictions in a patient-specific setting. This work highlights the importance of spatial structure in models of epithelial carcinogenesis and suggests that patient age at diagnosis may be a critical predictor of the size and multiplicity of precancerous lesions. Cancer Res; 76(24); 7078-88. ©2016 AACR.

Indexed as

Models, TheoreticalAdultAgedAge of OnsetBayes TheoremCarcinoma, Squamous CellHead and Neck NeoplasmsHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPrecancerous ConditionsRisk FactorsSEER ProgramSquamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and NeckTobacco Use

Identifiers

PMID27913438
PMCPMC5432417

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.