ArticleBMC genomics2016
STR-realigner: a realignment method for short tandem repeat regions.
Article in BMC genomics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- STRaM: A genetic framework for improved cell product provenance for research and clinical translations.Communications biology · 2025Article
- Get ready for short tandem repeats analysis using long reads-the challenges and the state of the art.Frontiers in genetics · 2025Review
- A nuclear genome assembly of an extinct flightless bird, the little bush moa.Science advances · 2024Article
- LUSTR: a new customizable tool for calling genome-wide germline and somatic short tandem repeat variants.BMC genomics · 2024Article
- Immune checkpoint inhibitor-related molecular markers predict prognosis in extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.Cancer medicine · 2023Article
- nPoRe: n-polymer realigner for improved pileup-based variant calling.BMC bioinformatics · 2023Article
- Phenome-wide association study of loci harboring de novo tandem repeat mutations in UK Biobank exomes.Nature communications · 2022Article
- Review
- Genetic Variation and the Distribution of Variant Types in the Horse.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Article
- Characterizing microsatellite polymorphisms using assembly-based and mapping-based tools.Turkish journal of biology = Turk biyoloji dergisi · 2019Article
- The NSIGHT1-randomized controlled trial: rapid whole-genome sequencing for accelerated etiologic diagnosis in critically ill infants.NPJ genomic medicine · 2018Article
- Profiling of Short-Tandem-Repeat Disease Alleles in 12,632 Human Whole Genomes.American journal of human genetics · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn the estimation of repeat numbers in a short tandem repeat (STR) region from high-throughput sequencing data, two types of strategies are mainly taken: a strategy based on counting repeat patterns included in sequence reads spanning the region and a strategy based on estimating the difference between the actual insert size and the insert size inferred from paired-end reads. The quality of sequence alignment is crucial, especially in the former approaches although usual alignment methods have difficulty in STR regions due to insertions and deletions caused by the variations of repeat numbers.
resultsWe proposed a new dynamic programming based realignment method named STR-realigner that considers repeat patterns in STR regions as prior knowledge. By allowing the size change of repeat patterns with low penalty in STR regions, accurate realignment is expected. For the performance evaluation, publicly available STR variant calling tools were applied to three types of aligned reads: synthetically generated sequencing reads aligned with BWA-MEM, those realigned with STR-realigner, those realigned with ReviSTER, and those realigned with GATK IndelRealigner. From the comparison of root mean squared errors between estimated and true STR region size, the results for the dataset realigned with STR-realigner are better than those for other cases. For real data analysis, we used a real sequencing dataset from Illumina HiSeq 2000 for a parent-offspring trio. RepeatSeq and lobSTR were applied to the sequence reads for these individuals aligned with BWA-MEM, those realigned with STR-realigner, ReviSTER, and GATK IndelRealigner. STR-realigner shows the best performance in terms of consistency of the size of estimated STR regions in Mendelian inheritance. Root mean squared error values were also calculated from the comparison of these estimated results with STR region sizes obtained from high coverage PacBio sequencing data, and the results from the realigned sequencing data with STR-realigner showed the least (the best) root mean squared error value.
conclusionsThe effectiveness of the proposed realignment method for STR regions was verified from the comparison with an existing method on both simulation datasets and real whole genome sequencing dataset.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.