ReviewTissue engineering. Part B, Reviews2017
Biomimetic Approaches for Bone Tissue Engineering.
Review in Tissue engineering. Part B, Reviews, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
37 citing papers in PubMed, 90 citations in OpenAlex.
- Silk fibroin/nano-hydroxyapatite scaffolds with graphene oxide induce macrophage M2 polarization and enhance angiogenesis to facilitate bone repair.RSC advances · 2026Article
- Janus Membranes as Multifunctional Nanostructures for Bone Defect Repair: Advances, Challenges, and Clinical Translation.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Bioactive deproteinized bovine bone mineral based on self-assembled albumin nanoparticles promoted bone regeneration via activation of Wnt/β-catenin pathway.Materials today. Bio · 2025Article
- Biomimetic composite gelatin methacryloyl hydrogels for improving survival and osteogenesis of human adipose-derived stem cells in 3D microenvironment.Materials today. Bio · 2024Article
- Research progress of gene therapy combined with tissue engineering to promote bone regeneration.APL bioengineering · 2024Review
- Some Mechanical Constraints to the Biomimicry with Peripheral Nerves.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Calcium Phosphate-Based Nanomaterials: Preparation, Multifunction, and Application for Bone Tissue Engineering.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Calcium Phosphate Delivery Systems for Regeneration and Biomineralization of Mineralized Tissues of the Craniofacial Complex.Molecular pharmaceutics · 2023Review
- Osteoblast derived extracellular vesicles induced by dexamethasone: A novel biomimetic tool for enhancing osteogenesisFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Article
- Advanced 3D Magnetic Scaffolds for Tumor-Related Bone Defects.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Key Challenges in Diamond Coating of Titanium Implants: Current Status and Future Prospects.Biomedicines · 2022Review
- Bone Regeneration with 3D-Printed Hybrid Bone Scaffolds in a Canine Radial Bone Defect Model.Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine · 2022Article
- Translating musculoskeletal bioengineering into tissue regeneration therapies.Science translational medicine · 2022Review
- In Vitro Hydrolytic Degradation of Polyester-Based Scaffolds under Static and Dynamic Conditions in a Customized Perfusion Bioreactor.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Article
- Bioengineered Living Bone Grafts-A Concise Review on Bioreactors and Production Techniques In Vitro.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- On-Growth and In-Growth Osseointegration Enhancement in PM Porous Ti-Scaffolds by Two Different Bioactivation Strategies: Alkali Thermochemical Treatment and RGD Peptide Coating.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Multifunctional GelMA platforms with nanomaterials for advanced tissue therapeutics.Bioactive materials · 2022Review
- Review
- Sustained release of naringin from silk-fibroin-nanohydroxyapatite scaffold for the enhancement of bone regeneration.Materials today. Bio · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Although autologous bone grafts are considered a gold standard for the treatment of bone defects, they are limited by donor site morbidities and geometric requirements. We propose that tissue engineering technology can overcome such limitations by recreating fully viable and biological bone grafts. Specifically, we will discuss the use of bone scaffolds and autologous cells with bioreactor culture systems as a tissue engineering paradigm to grow bone in vitro. We will also discuss emergent vascularization strategies to promote graft survival in vivo, as well as the role of inflammation during bone repair. Finally, we will highlight some recent advances and discuss new solutions to bone repair inspired by endochondral ossification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.