Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27912056›Full record

ReviewCell2016

Conflict Resolution in the Genome: How Transcription and Replication Make It Work.

Stephan Hamperl, Karlene A Cimprich

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cell, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 178 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
178citing papers in PubMed
14.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

178 citing papers in PubMed, 268 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

118 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Stephan HamperlDepartment of Chemical and Systems Biology, Stanford University School of Medicine, 318 Campus Drive, Stanford, CA 94305-5441, USA.
Karlene A CimprichDepartment of Chemical and Systems Biology, Stanford University School of Medicine, 318 Campus Drive, Stanford, CA 94305-5441, USA. Electronic address: cimprich@stanford.edu.
Stanford University · US

Funding

Transcription-Associated Genome InstabilityR01GM119334 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Karlene A Cimprich · 2016 to 2026
$4.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM119334
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The complex machineries involved in replication and transcription translocate along the same DNA template, often in opposing directions and at different rates. These processes routinely interfere with each other in prokaryotes, and mounting evidence now suggests that RNA polymerase complexes also encounter replication forks in higher eukaryotes. Indeed, cells rely on numerous mechanisms to avoid, tolerate, and resolve such transcription-replication conflicts, and the absence of these mechanisms can lead to catastrophic effects on genome stability and cell viability. In this article, we review the cellular responses to transcription-replication conflicts and highlight how these inevitable encounters shape the genome and impact diverse cellular processes.

Indexed as

DNA ReplicationTranscription, GeneticAnimalsBacteriaCell CycleDNA-Directed RNA PolymerasesDNA RepairEukaryotaGenomic InstabilityHumansDNA-Directed RNA Polymerases

Identifiers

PMID27912056
PMCPMC5141617
OpenAlexW2557435811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.