Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27911825›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2016

Elucidating the druggable interface of protein-protein interactions using fragment docking and coevolutionary analysis.

Fang Bai, Faruck Morcos, Ryan R Cheng, Hualiang Jiang, José N Onuchic

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. DeepDegradome: A structure-aware deep learning framework for PROTAC and ligand generation against protein targets.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Engineering gain-of-function mutants of a WW domain by dynamics and structural analysis.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2023
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Machine Learning in Drug Discovery: A Review.Artificial intelligence review · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Identifying hydrophobic protein patches to inform protein interaction interfaces.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Epistatic contributions promote the unification of incompatible models of neutral molecular evolution.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Fang BaiCenter for Theoretical Biological Physics, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005.
Faruck MorcosDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Texas at Dallas, Dallas, TX 75080.
Ryan R ChengCenter for Theoretical Biological Physics, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005.
Hualiang JiangDrug Discovery and Design Center, State Key Laboratory of Drug Research, Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 201203, China; jonuchic@rice.edu hljiang@mail.simm.ac.cn.
José N OnuchicCenter for Theoretical Biological Physics, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005; jonuchic@rice.edu hljiang@mail.simm.ac.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein-protein interactions play a central role in cellular function. Improving the understanding of complex formation has many practical applications, including the rational design of new therapeutic agents and the mechanisms governing signal transduction networks. The generally large, flat, and relatively featureless binding sites of protein complexes pose many challenges for drug design. Fragment docking and direct coupling analysis are used in an integrated computational method to estimate druggable protein-protein interfaces. (i) This method explores the binding of fragment-sized molecular probes on the protein surface using a molecular docking-based screen. (ii) The energetically favorable binding sites of the probes, called hot spots, are spatially clustered to map out candidate binding sites on the protein surface. (iii) A coevolution-based interface interaction score is used to discriminate between different candidate binding sites, yielding potential interfacial targets for therapeutic drug design. This approach is validated for important, well-studied disease-related proteins with known pharmaceutical targets, and also identifies targets that have yet to be studied. Moreover, therapeutic agents are proposed by chemically connecting the fragments that are strongly bound to the hot spots.

Indexed as

Drug DesignProtein Interaction Domains and MotifsBinding SitesCDC2-CDC28 KinasesCDC2 Protein KinaseEvolution, MolecularHistone Deacetylase 1Histone DeacetylasesHIV-1HIV ProteaseHIV Protease InhibitorsHumansMolecular Docking SimulationMolecular ProbesProtein MultimerizationProto-Oncogene Proteins c-mdm2CDC2-CDC28 KinasesCDC2 Protein KinaseCDK1 protein, humanCKS1B protein, humanHDAC1 protein, humanHistone Deacetylase 1Histone DeacetylasesHIV ProteaseHIV Protease InhibitorsMDM2 protein, humanMolecular ProbesMTA1 protein, humanp16 protease, Human immunodeficiency virus 1Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-mdm2Repressor ProteinsTrans-ActivatorsTumor Necrosis Factor-alphadirect coupling analysisdrug designdruggable surfacehot spotsprotein−protein interface

Identifiers

PMID27911825
PMCPMC5167203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.