Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27911808›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2016

Exploration of joint redundancy but not task space variability facilitates supervised motor learning.

Puneet Singh, Sumitash Jana, Ashitava Ghosal, Aditya Murthy

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Neural network retuning and neural predictors of learning success associated with cello training.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Generalization inFrontiers in sports and active living · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Quantitative Assessment of Learning and Retention in Virtual Vocal Function Exercises.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Puneet SinghCentre for Biosystems Science and Engineering, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560012, India.
Sumitash JanaCentre for Neuroscience, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560012, India.
Ashitava GhosalDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560012, India asitava@mecheng.iisc.ernet.in aditya@cns.iisc.ernet.in.
Aditya MurthyCentre for Neuroscience, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560012, India; asitava@mecheng.iisc.ernet.in aditya@cns.iisc.ernet.in.
Indian Institute of Science Bangalore · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The number of joints and muscles in a human arm is more than what is required for reaching to a desired point in 3D space. Although previous studies have emphasized how such redundancy and the associated flexibility may play an important role in path planning, control of noise, and optimization of motion, whether and how redundancy might promote motor learning has not been investigated. In this work, we quantify redundancy space and investigate its significance and effect on motor learning. We propose that a larger redundancy space leads to faster learning across subjects. We observed this pattern in subjects learning novel kinematics (visuomotor adaptation) and dynamics (force-field adaptation). Interestingly, we also observed differences in the redundancy space between the dominant hand and nondominant hand that explained differences in the learning of dynamics. Taken together, these results provide support for the hypothesis that redundancy aids in motor learning and that the redundant component of motor variability is not noise.

Indexed as

AdultAgedArmBiomechanical PhenomenaEnteral NutritionFemaleFunctional LateralityHumansJointsLearningMaleMiddle AgedModels, BiologicalMotor SkillsPsychomotor PerformanceTask Performance and Analysisminimum-intervention principlemotor controlmotor noisereachingsupervised learning

Identifiers

PMID27911808
PMCPMC5167208
OpenAlexW2559510038

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.