Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27911801›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2016

Mechanical bounds to transcriptional noise.

Stuart A Sevier, David A Kessler, Herbert Levine

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Volumetric compression develops noise-driven single-cell heterogeneity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Stuart A SevierDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005; herbert.levine@rice.edu s.a.sevier@rice.edu.
David A KesslerDepartment of Physics, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan IL52900, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-5279-1655
Herbert LevineDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005; herbert.levine@rice.edu s.a.sevier@rice.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the past several decades it has been increasingly recognized that stochastic processes play a central role in transcription. Although many stochastic effects have been explained, the source of transcriptional bursting (one of the most well-known sources of stochasticity) has continued to evade understanding. Recent results have pointed to mechanical feedback as the source of transcriptional bursting, but a reconciliation of this perspective with preexisting views of transcriptional regulation is lacking. In this article, we present a simple phenomenological model that is able to incorporate the traditional view of gene expression within a framework with mechanical limits to transcription. By introducing a simple competition between mechanical arrest and relaxation copy number probability distributions collapse onto a shared universal curve under shifting and rescaling and a lower limit of intrinsic noise for any mean expression level is found.

Indexed as

AnimalsDNA, SuperhelicalDNA Topoisomerases, Type IGene Expression RegulationHumansMechanoreceptorsModels, BiologicalModels, TheoreticalProbabilityRNA, MessengerStochastic ProcessesTranscriptional ActivationTranscription, GeneticDNA, SuperhelicalDNA Topoisomerases, Type IRNA, Messengerbursting noisesupercoilingtopoisomerasetranscription

Identifiers

PMID27911801
PMCPMC5150389

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.