Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27911790›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2016

Psychopathic individuals exhibit but do not avoid regret during counterfactual decision making.

Arielle Baskin-Sommers, Allison M Stuppy-Sullivan, Joshua W Buckholtz

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Emotional Context Sculpts Action Goal Representations in the Lateral Frontal Pole.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Norms and the Flexibility of Moral Action.Personality neuroscience · 2018
    Review
  19. The neuroscience of morality and social decision-making.Psychology, crime & law : PC & L · 2018
    Article
  20. White matter correlates of psychopathic traits in a female community sample.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Arielle Baskin-SommersDepartment of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511; arielle.baskin-sommers@yale.edu joshuabuckholtz@fas.harvard.edu.
Allison M Stuppy-SullivanDepartment of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511.
Joshua W BuckholtzDepartment of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138; arielle.baskin-sommers@yale.edu joshuabuckholtz@fas.harvard.edu.
Yale University · USHarvard University · US

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Psychopathy is associated with persistent antisocial behavior and a striking lack of regret for the consequences of that behavior. Although explanatory models for psychopathy have largely focused on deficits in affective responsiveness, recent work indicates that aberrant value-based decision making may also play a role. On that basis, some have suggested that psychopathic individuals may be unable to effectively use prospective simulations to update action value estimates during cost-benefit decision making. However, the specific mechanisms linking valuation, affective deficits, and maladaptive decision making in psychopathy remain unclear. Using a counterfactual decision-making paradigm, we found that individuals who scored high on a measure of psychopathy were as or more likely than individuals low on psychopathy to report negative affect in response to regret-inducing counterfactual outcomes. However, despite exhibiting intact affective regret sensitivity, they did not use prospective regret signals to guide choice behavior. In turn, diminished behavioral regret sensitivity predicted a higher number of prior incarcerations, and moderated the relationship between psychopathy and incarceration history. These findings raise the possibility that maladaptive decision making in psychopathic individuals is not a consequence of their inability to generate or experience negative emotions. Rather, antisocial behavior in psychopathy may be driven by a deficit in the generation of forward models that integrate information about rules, costs, and goals with stimulus value representations to promote adaptive behavior.

Indexed as

Decision MakingEmotionsAdolescentAdultAffectAntisocial Personality DisorderChoice BehaviorCriminal BehaviorGamblingHumansMaleMiddle AgedModels, PsychologicalProspective StudiesRewardYoung Adultaffectcounterfactual reasoningdecision makingpsychopathyreward

Identifiers

PMID27911790
PMCPMC5167137
OpenAlexW2558854255

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.