Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27911605›Full record

ArticleEndocrinology2017

GnRH Neuron Activity and Pituitary Response in Estradiol-Induced vs Proestrous Luteinizing Hormone Surges in Female Mice.

Marina A Silveira, Laura L Burger, R Anthony DeFazio, Elizabeth R Wagenmaker, Suzanne M Moenter

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Endocrinology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
7.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone (GnRH) Neuron Excitability Is Regulated by Estradiol Feedback and Kisspeptin.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2018
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Marina A SilveiraDepartment of Anatomy, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Laura L BurgerDepartments of Molecular and Integrative Physiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
R Anthony DeFazioDepartments of Molecular and Integrative Physiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Elizabeth R WagenmakerDepartments of Molecular and Integrative Physiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Suzanne M MoenterDepartments of Molecular and Integrative Physiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Laboratoire d’immunologie intégrative du cancer · FRUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

Central Actions of Estrogens: Effects on GnRH NeuronsR01HD041469 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE · PI Suzanne M MOENTER · 2002 to 2026
$8.8M
Testosterone-GnRH Frequency and the Evolution of PCOS in AdolescenceP50HD028934 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI HAISENLEDER, DANIEL J. · 2014 to 2018
$8.6M
NICHD NIH HHS P50 HD028934NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD041469
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During the female reproductive cycle, estradiol exerts negative and positive feedback at both the central level to alter gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) release and at the pituitary to affect response to GnRH. Many studies of the neurobiologic mechanisms underlying estradiol feedback have been done on ovariectomized, estradiol-replaced (OVX+E) mice. In this model, GnRH neuron activity depends on estradiol and time of day, increasing in estradiol-treated mice in the late afternoon, coincident with a daily luteinizing hormone (LH) surge. Amplitude of this surge appears lower than in proestrous mice, perhaps because other ovarian factors are not replaced. We hypothesized GnRH neuron activity is greater during the proestrous-preovulatory surge than the estradiol-induced surge. GnRH neuron activity was monitored by extracellular recordings from fluorescently tagged GnRH neurons in brain slices in the late afternoon from diestrous, proestrous, and OVX+E mice. Mean GnRH neuron firing rate was low on diestrus; firing rate was similarly increased in proestrous and OVX+E mice. Bursts of action potentials have been associated with hormone release in neuroendocrine systems. Examination of the patterning of action potentials revealed a shift toward longer burst duration in proestrous mice, whereas intervals between spikes were shorter in OVX+E mice. LH response to an early afternoon injection of GnRH was greater in proestrous than diestrous or OVX+E mice. These observations suggest the lower LH surge amplitude observed in the OVX+E model is likely not attributable to altered mean GnRH neuron activity, but because of reduced pituitary sensitivity, subtle shifts in action potential pattern, and/or excitation-secretion coupling in GnRH neurons.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAnimalsEstradiolFemaleGonadotropin-Releasing HormoneLuteinizing HormoneMice, Inbred C57BLNeuronsPituitary GlandProestrusEstradiolGonadotropin-Releasing HormoneLuteinizing Hormone

Identifiers

PMID27911605
PMCPMC5413083
OpenAlexW2558532854

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.